著者
Tetsuji Morishita Hiroyasu Uzui Hiroyuki Ikeda Naoki Amaya Kenichi Kaseno Kentaro Ishida Yoshitomo Fukuoka Hiroshi Tada
出版者
The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
雑誌
Internal Medicine (ISSN:09182918)
巻号頁・発行日
pp.2616-19, (Released:2019-06-27)
参考文献数
39
被引用文献数
5

Objective Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are regulated by stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha (SDF-1α) and are reduced in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). SDF-1α is a substrate of dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP-4), so we investigated whether or not DPP-4-inhibitors modulate EPC levels in type 2 DM patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods Thirty patients with CAD and type 2 DM treated using an ordinary regimen were enrolled. EPC and SDF-1α levels were compared between those receiving additional 24-week treatment with a DPP-4-inhibitor (n=11) and no additional treatment (n=19). We determined the HbA1c, 1.5-Anhydro-D-glucitol (1,5-AG), coronary flow reserve (CFR), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), E/e', and circulating EPC proportion and SDF-1α levels at baseline and the end of follow-up. The CFR was assessed using a dual-sensor-equipped guidewire. The primary endpoints were changes in the EPC count, SDF-1α levels, and CFR from baseline to the end of follow-up. The secondary endpoints were changes in the HbA1C and 1,5-AG, which are useful clinical markers of postprandial hyperglycemia, as well as the BNP and E/e'. Results After the 6-month follow-up, compared with ordinary regimen subjects, the patients receiving a DPP-4-inhibitor showed no significant increase in the EPC proportion (−0.01%±0.50% vs. 0.02%±0.77%, p=0.87), SDF-1α level (−600.4±653.6 vs. −283.2±543.1 pg/ml, p=0.18), or CFR (0.0+0.2 vs. 0.1+0.6, p=0.20), whereas both the 1.5-AG level (2.4±4.6 vs. −0.7±2.5 μg/dL, p=0.07) and HbA1C (−0.8%±1.8% vs. 0.0%±0.7%, p=0.02) were improved. There were no significant differences between the two groups in changes in the BNP and E/e'. Conclusion DPP-4 inhibition with sitagliptin did not increase or decrease the EPC proportion, SDF-1α level, or CFR, although the glycemic control was improved.
著者
Kenichi Kaseno Shigeto Naito Kohki Nakamura Tamotsu Sakamoto Takehito Sasaki Naofumi Tsukada Mamoru Hayano Suguru Nishiuchi Etsuko Fuke Yuko Miki Keijiro Nakamura Eiji Yamashita Koji Kumagai Shigeru Oshima Hiroshi Tada
出版者
日本循環器学会
雑誌
Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.76, no.10, pp.2337-2342, 2012 (Released:2012-09-25)
参考文献数
26
被引用文献数
53 73

Background: Periprocedural anticoagulation using uninterrupted warfarin could reduce the risk of thromboembolic complications of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Few studies, however, have evaluated the efficacy and safety of periprocedural dabigatran in AF ablation. Methods and Results: A total of 211 consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation, including 110 patients who received 110mg dabigatran twice daily (group D) and 101 patients who received dose-adjusted warfarin (international normalized ratio, 2.0–3.0; group W), were evaluated. Dabigatran was discontinued on the morning of the procedure, and resumed on the next morning. Warfarin was continued throughout the procedure. During the procedure, heparin infusion was maintained to achieve an activated clotting time of >300s. Postprocedural cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in 60 patients (group D, n=31; group W, n=29). No periprocedural deaths or symptomatic thromboembolic complications were observed in either group. MRI indicated a silent cerebral infarction in 1 patient in each group. Five patients in group D and 11 in group W had minor bleeding (P=0.12). Cardiac tamponade occurred in 2 patients in group W, but in none in group D. Total bleeding complications occurred less frequently in group D (4.5%) than in group W (12.9%; P<0.05). Conclusions: Dabigatran at a dose of 110mg twice daily was safe for AF ablation in patients with a relatively low risk of thromboemboli, suggesting that it may become an alternative to warfarin in those patients.  (Circ J 2012; 76: 2337–2342)