- 著者
- Shunsuke Tanoue Kenichiro Ono Terushige Toyooka Masaya Nakagawa Kojiro Wada
- 出版者
- The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy
- 雑誌
- Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy (ISSN:18824072)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- pp.oa.2023-0048, (Released:2023-12-01)
- 参考文献数
- 18
Objective: Transradial approach (TRA) is increasingly used as a viable alternative to the traditional transfemoral approach (TFA) in neuroendovascular therapy (NET) owing to its potential anatomical benefits and lower puncture-site complication rates. However, the real-world challenges of implementing TRA-NET have not been thoroughly studied, particularly those related to guide catheter (GC) placement. In this study, we aimed to explore the feasibility and challenges of TRA-NET, with a specific focus on GC placement.Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent NET at our institution between December 2019 and May 2022. Procedural success was defined as the successful placement of a GC in the target vessel. Cases in which a Simmons-shaped GC was used or the approach was changed to TFA were classified as difficult. Safety was assessed based on the rate of severe puncture-site complications requiring either blood transfusion or surgical intervention.Results: Among the 310 patients who underwent NET during the study period, 222 (71.6%) with a median age of 74 years were selected for TRA-NET. The target vessel was in the left anterior circulation (LtAC) in 101 (45.5%) patients, and 8-F GCs were the most frequently used (40.1%). TRA-NET achieved a 95.0% success rate, with a switch to TFA required in 5.0% of the cases. Procedural challenges occurred in 42 (18.9%) patients, primarily in those with LtAC lesions. Specifically, a type III aortic arch (p <0.0001) and age ≥80 years (p = 0.01) were significantly associated with procedural difficulties. Radial artery evaluation was confirmed in 66 cases (29.7%), revealing one instance (1.5%) of radial artery occlusion. No severe puncture-site complications were observed.Conclusion: TRA-NET may provide substantial therapeutic benefits without significant limitations in device use. However, it may be challenging, particularly in older patients and those with a type III aortic arch with LtAC lesions. Consequently, careful selection of the approach route is imperative.
- 著者
- Shunsuke Tanoue Kenichiro Ono Toru Yoshiura Masataka Miyama Hidenori Okawa Toshiki Shirotani
- 出版者
- The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy
- 雑誌
- Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy (ISSN:18824072)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- pp.tn.2020-0060, (Released:2021-01-06)
- 参考文献数
- 19
Objective: We report a case of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) via the distal transradial approach (dTRA) and technical tips.Case Presentation: An 89-year-old woman was transferred to our hospital due to back pain after a fall and sudden-onset left hemiparesis. We performed MT because three-dimensional computed tomography angiography (3D-CTA) revealed right middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion. The access route was Type 3 aortic arch. The abdominal aorta and common iliac artery were tortuous and partially dissected, and she had a lumbar vertebra fracture. We selected dTRA in consideration of safety, ease of access, and less postoperative postural restriction. The first pass resulted in complete recanalization using an aspiration catheter and stent retriever. Her symptoms rapidly improved and she was discharged with a modified Rankin Scale score of 1.Conclusion: dTRA in MT may be a treatment option.