著者

Toru YOSHIURA Satoru TAKEUCHI Terushige TOYOOKA Arata TOMIYAMA Kojiro WADA Yasuaki NAKAO Takuji YAMAMOTO Kentaro MORI

出版者

The Japan Neurosurgical Society

雑誌

Neurologia medico-chirurgica (ISSN:04708105)

巻号頁・発行日

pp.2023-0157, (Released:2023-11-08)

参考文献数

28

---

In Japan, brain docking has enhanced the detection of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in healthy adults. At our institution, surgical clipping is the first-line treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA). In this study, the differences in neurological and radiological outcomes, as well as cognitive and psychological results, between standard clipping and keyhole clipping for these aneurysms detected via brain docking were evaluated. The study included 131 aneurysms detected via "brain dock." Of these, 65 were treated with keyhole clipping surgery (keyhole clipping group), and 66 were treated with standard clipping surgery (standard clipping group). Evaluations at 3 months included the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, modified Rankin Scale, Mini-Mental State Examination, Hasegawa's Dementia Scale-revised, Beck Depression Inventory, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, and radiological abnormalities. The mean operative time and postoperative hospitalization period were significantly shorter in the keyhole clipping group than in the standard clipping group (p < 0.001). Between the groups, no significant differences in postoperative neurological complications or radiological abnormalities were found. The keyhole clipping group demonstrated slightly but significantly better Beck Depression Inventory and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores than the standard clipping group (Beck Depression Inventory, p = 0.046; Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, p < 0.01). Both the Beck Depression Inventory and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores at 3 months were significantly enhanced (p < 0.001) in the keyhole clipping group. These findings propose that keyhole clipping could be considered a new therapeutic option for small UIA detected via brain docking.

著者

Shunsuke Tanoue Kenichiro Ono Terushige Toyooka Masaya Nakagawa Kojiro Wada

出版者

The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy

雑誌

Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy (ISSN:18824072)

巻号頁・発行日

pp.oa.2023-0048, (Released:2023-12-01)

参考文献数

18

---

Objective: Transradial approach (TRA) is increasingly used as a viable alternative to the traditional transfemoral approach (TFA) in neuroendovascular therapy (NET) owing to its potential anatomical benefits and lower puncture-site complication rates. However, the real-world challenges of implementing TRA-NET have not been thoroughly studied, particularly those related to guide catheter (GC) placement. In this study, we aimed to explore the feasibility and challenges of TRA-NET, with a specific focus on GC placement.Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent NET at our institution between December 2019 and May 2022. Procedural success was defined as the successful placement of a GC in the target vessel. Cases in which a Simmons-shaped GC was used or the approach was changed to TFA were classified as difficult. Safety was assessed based on the rate of severe puncture-site complications requiring either blood transfusion or surgical intervention.Results: Among the 310 patients who underwent NET during the study period, 222 (71.6%) with a median age of 74 years were selected for TRA-NET. The target vessel was in the left anterior circulation (LtAC) in 101 (45.5%) patients, and 8-F GCs were the most frequently used (40.1%). TRA-NET achieved a 95.0% success rate, with a switch to TFA required in 5.0% of the cases. Procedural challenges occurred in 42 (18.9%) patients, primarily in those with LtAC lesions. Specifically, a type III aortic arch (p <0.0001) and age ≥80 years (p = 0.01) were significantly associated with procedural difficulties. Radial artery evaluation was confirmed in 66 cases (29.7%), revealing one instance (1.5%) of radial artery occlusion. No severe puncture-site complications were observed.Conclusion: TRA-NET may provide substantial therapeutic benefits without significant limitations in device use. However, it may be challenging, particularly in older patients and those with a type III aortic arch with LtAC lesions. Consequently, careful selection of the approach route is imperative.