著者
平山 久雄
出版者
東洋文庫
雑誌
東洋学報 = The Toyo Gakuho
巻号頁・発行日
vol.49, no.1, pp.42-68, 1966-06

We divide the labial and gutteral syllables with the medial /-i-/ of Ancient Chinese into three classes; (The phonemic interpretation is prof. Mineya’s. cf. Gengo Kenkyu 22/23 and 31) class A: syllables with the front vowel /a/ or /e/ and with /j/ as the palatalizing element of initials. class B: syllables with the front vowel /a/ or /e/ but without /j/. class C: syllables with the back vowel /ɑ/ or /ʌ/,There can be found in the fanch‘iehs of Ch‘iehyün a kind of selection between the resultant word and the upper ch‘ieh word concerning the classes to which they belong, i.e. the class of the resultant word A B C the class of the upper ch‘ieh words AorC BorC CAs these selections are quite precise, it is possible to use them as a criterion to decide the phonemic values of the rimes 蒸職 and 之 which remain yet unsettled. The results we have obtained are as follows; i) The rimes 蒸職 had the values of /-ieŋ, -iek, -iuek/ (class B) under the labial initials, the gutteral initials of hok’ou and the retroflex initials (正歯音二等), while under the remaining conditions they had the values of /-iʌŋ, -iʌk, -iuʌk/ as have been assumed before. ii) The rime 之 had the value of /-iʌɯ/ (the phoneme /ɯ/ is newly assumed to interpret this rime.), the phonetic value of which might be [-iěɩ] or [-iɩ].The reconstructions mentioned above are also supported by the study of fanch’iehs contained in the Tunhuang fragments of Maoshiyin (毛詩音), and by the regularity of correspondence to Archaic Chinese.

言及状況

Twitter (1 users, 1 posts, 0 favorites)

この論文だと、庚三ではなく蒸韻の方を清韻と関連付けてるみたいね。ただ、舌上音を莊組と同種のものと考える場合(この論文は多分そうじゃない)、清韻がB類側にも現れることになるので、この論文での蒸韻と衝突することになるのかな? 東洋文庫リポジトリ-トップページ https://t.co/cRfDUbGOsg

収集済み URL リスト