著者
"シブタニ タモツ 木原 綾香 奥田 真悟 桑原 司"
出版者
鹿児島大学
雑誌
Discussion papers in economics and sociology (ISSN:1347085X)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.1301, (Released:2016-10-28)

"タモツ・シブタニ著, 木原綾香, 奥田真悟, 桑原司訳"
著者
桑原 司 Kuwabara Tsukasa
出版者
鹿児島大学
雑誌
Discussion papers in economics and sociology (ISSN:1347085X)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.203, 2002-09-03

The Chicago School of Symbolic Interactionism (one trend of the "Chicago Renaissance") represented by the works of Herbert Blumer, has been seen to be major alternative to functionalism and and social system theory in American Sociology. In addition, this approach also has been important in sociology as a critique of positivism. Furthermore, according to T. Shibutani, "it is too early for a final assessment of Blumer's work. That will have to wait until the twenty-first century, when future historians will be able to see what remains of current Sociology. It seems likely that many of his view will prevail." So far, We have done many reviewing about Blumer's Symbolic Interactionism. The results which could be gotten as the result are summarized in the following paper [Tsukasa Kuwabara, 2001,"Introduction to a sociological perspective of Symbolic Interactionism(3) (The Summary of a doctoral dissertation, Tohoku University), "KEIZAIGAKU-RONSHU- OF KAGOSHIMA UNIVERSITY (ISSN=0389-0104) :No.54, The Economic Society of Kagoshima University, pp.69-86]. In this article, we are trying to clarify theaspects which compose the reason why Blumer's Symbolic Interactionism is generally categorized as one trend of the "Chicago Renaissance".
著者
"桑原 司"
出版者
鹿児島大学
雑誌
Discussion papers in economics and sociology (ISSN:1347085X)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.902, (Released:2016-10-28)
著者
KUWABARA Tsukasa
出版者
鹿児島大学
雑誌
Discussion papers in economics and sociology (ISSN:1347085X)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.1701, pp.1-6, 2017-09-06 (Released:2017-09-12)
出版者
鹿児島大学
雑誌
Discussion papers in economics and sociology (ISSN:1347085X)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.701, (Released:2016-10-28)

本論は、2001年3月に鹿児島大学経済学会『経済学論集』54 に掲載された論文「東北大学審査学位論文(博士)の要旨-- シンボリック相互作用論序説(3)--」(以下、桑原2001年)及び2003年3月に『鹿児島大学総合情報処理センター 広報』16に掲載された原稿「編集後記」(以下、桑原2003年)の正誤表である。