著者
高木 浩光
出版者
情報法制学会
雑誌
情報法制研究 (ISSN:24330264)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2, pp.75-66, 2017 (Released:2019-10-02)
被引用文献数
1

The discussions made in the revision of the Act on the Protection of Personal Information in 2015 revealed the issues that could not be achieved with the amendment, and highlighted that a number of unresolved problems remain in current legislation. One of the issues that could not be achieved is that it was not realized despite being understood that it was necessary to include individual behavioral data recorded with device identifier as the subject of protection under the Act. And the unresolved problem with current legislation is, for example, that the interpretation of the sentence "can be easily matched with other information" in the definition of personal information has not been clarified. This series of papers attempts to propose a direction to solve the remaining issues for the next revision of the Act. Specifically, by focusing on the difference between "personal information" and "personal data", by clarifying the difference in interpretation between the sentence "can be easily matched with" and "can be matched with", we aim to unify only the provision on "personal information file" in the private sector and the public sector.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (16 users, 18 posts, 42 favorites)

(追記) 高木浩光先生の「個人情報保護から個人データ保護へ(2)」『情報法制研究』2号75頁の91頁以下に、1970年代からの世界の個人データ保護とプロファイリング・コンピュータ自動処理拒否権の歴史に関する詳しい解説が載っています。https://t.co/wAMZuqh3xR

Wikipedia (1 pages, 1 posts, 1 contributors)

収集済み URL リスト