著者
金 洛年
出版者
土地制度史学会(現 政治経済学・経済史学会)
雑誌
土地制度史学 (ISSN:04933567)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.37, no.2, pp.1-16, 1995-01-20 (Released:2017-12-30)

The purpose of this paper is to show how industrialization of Korea in the 1930s was influenced by the preceding agricultural development plans for increasing rice production (1920-34). Until now the rapid industrialization has been explained mainly by Japan's armaments-expanding policy in the 1930s. However this paper emphasizes internal factors created in the process of agricultural transformation in the 1920s. On the one hand, increase in rice production and its export to Japan at relatively high price produced an enormous surplus in the agricultural sector. This, in turn, enabled Korea to increase imports of manufatured goods. Through the agricultural development and trade with Japan, Korean economy could rapidly expand markets for manufactured goods beyond her production capacity. Later this expansion stimulated new rise and growth of many small-scale factories owned by Koreans or Japanese residents in Korea. Also it induced private direct investments from Japan to the manufaturing industry in Korea. This process promoted import substitution for manufactured goods. On the other hand, most of agricultural surplus fell into the pockets of large landlords and merchants who took the lead in rice production and export under landlord-tenant system. In order to examine whether agricultural surplus remained within the agricultural sector or was transferred to other sectors, we made access to the available lists of large landlords and stockholders, and examined the relationship between them. The results of this examination revealed that a lot of landlords not only took actively part in stock investment, but also established their own companies in non-agricultural sectors. In case of the companies owned by Koreans, it is estimated that more than one third of their capital was invested by landlords and one forth of their owners were also landlords. In short, agricultural development in the 1920s provided favorable conditions for the industrialization in Korea in the next decade in terms of domestic market expansion and capital formation.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (10 users, 12 posts, 12 favorites)

@komakimaco @WmVtt7k @goldbug15 @henry_clay2017 @peach20211 @uruwasinoneko @mitugoro2 @green_hell_ad @vpXn5V4uDU90RdJ @newmakkiki @jinmu_tennou @Sabaandushi @4JVLd9aNjUXwI9Q @Tsuruga60k @yankumikourin99 @usuoguraizumo @xL3mUydnoO9wuAw @yonaosi_samurai @onino_huguri @kyowa2019 @kakitubata14 @soft_tractor @ObLaDiOblako2 @busokuten @XLYDchwddUH3aQB @t1ayo_man0ana @ukerundesujedoo @k2Bo5rRSaaJaDk5 @beru_ha_neko2 @Bo_San_2D @REON15768 @Shook_Say @uraaka_kill @payottelu @kamikaze_49_730 @schmalkaizen @TexasBronco3 @uTMCnYabOZcRgWa @STRIKER_GATX105 @hirohir00010018 @nkby177 @AARKdbWeK7hQeCV @07Adachi @Venom76392163 @keroro2gunsou @Bootstrap999 @Udrtanjirou @terunashi @akm74m792 @YiiMjop68Z4qYwZ 米の収奪イメージは 全羅北道の湖南平野に於ける「日帝による収奪」のイメージは、韓国人の歴史観に多大な影響を与えた趙廷来の小説『アリラン』によるもである。収奪していない理由も下の論文と違う気がする。 https://t.co/iX4QPPxodf
@WmVtt7k @komakimaco @goldbug15 @henry_clay2017 @peach20211 @uruwasinoneko @mitugoro2 @green_hell_ad @vpXn5V4uDU90RdJ @newmakkiki @jinmu_tennou @Sabaandushi @4JVLd9aNjUXwI9Q @Tsuruga60k @yankumikourin99 @usuoguraizumo @xL3mUydnoO9wuAw @yonaosi_samurai @onino_huguri @kyowa2019 @kakitubata14 @soft_tractor @ObLaDiOblako2 @busokuten @XLYDchwddUH3aQB @t1ayo_man0ana @ukerundesujedoo @k2Bo5rRSaaJaDk5 @beru_ha_neko2 @Bo_San_2D @REON15768 @Shook_Say @uraaka_kill @payottelu @kamikaze_49_730 @schmalkaizen @TexasBronco3 @uTMCnYabOZcRgWa @STRIKER_GATX105 @hirohir00010018 @nkby177 @AARKdbWeK7hQeCV @07Adachi @Venom76392163 @keroro2gunsou @Bootstrap999 @Udrtanjirou @terunashi @akm74m792 @YiiMjop68Z4qYwZ 朝鮮米増殖計画の論文。自分自身は、上の二つで基礎的な基本的なことは理解できると思っています。それ以外知りたいことは下の論文や公文書などありますので興味あれば探してみてください https://t.co/iX4QPPxodf
@MOJVpJvSaxZ1Gib @nighthawkf117aj 大雑把な決めつけだなあ この金さんの論文によると、 朝鮮人地主は増加し、 米を高く売れる日本へ輸出した対価をしっかり受け取り、 その資金で朝鮮工業化が図られた、と読める https://t.co/ypxAf46XDx

収集済み URL リスト