- 著者
-
橋爪 烈
- 出版者
- The Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan
- 雑誌
- オリエント (ISSN:00305219)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.48, no.1, pp.140-153, 2005
In this paper I deal with an unidentified manuscript held in the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Münich 378<sup>c</sup>, which is a chronicle covering 402-436H, namely the latter part of the Buwayhid dynasty. This manuscript preserves the content of the chronicle of Hilal al-Sabi, almost all of which has been lost, and has therefore been used in the study of Buwayhid history. Because it is an unidentified manuscript, its value as a source is diminished. In this paper I was able to determine the author and title of Münich 378<sup>c</sup>, and in that process it became clear that there is a problem of the manuscript line of <i>Mir'at al-Zaman</i>, and then I tried to organize this problem to.<br>In 1905 Amedroz examined Münich 378<sup>c</sup> by comparing it with the manuscript of <i>Mir'at al-Zaman</i> Or. 4619, but he came to no conclusion about the relationship. First, I reexamined his work, and I demonstrated the reason why he did not conclude that Münich 378<sup>c</sup> is a manuscript of <i>Mir'at al-Zaman</i>. Because, Or. 4619 is different from Münich 378<sup>c</sup> with respect to contents and the number of articles.<br>Second, I compared Münich 378<sup>c</sup> with manuscripts of <i>Mir'at al-Zaman</i> preserved in libraries of Istanbul, for example the libraries of Ahmet III and Köprülü. Münich 378<sup>c</sup> and the manuscripts of <i>Mir'at al-Zaman</i> in Istanbul turned out to belong the same line of manuscripts. Namely, Münich 378<sup>c</sup> is <i>Mir'at al-Zaman</i>, and the author is Sibt b. al-Jawzi.<br>Finally, in this paper I showed that <i>Mir'at al-Zaman</i> has two lines of manuscripts. Although this fact has been pointed out by Cl. Cahen and Li Guo, I demonstrated that problem of manuscript lines of <i>Mir'at al-Zaman</i> is more complicated than heretofore realized.