著者

橋爪 烈

出版者

一般社団法人 日本オリエント学会

雑誌

オリエント (ISSN:00305219)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.47, no.1, pp.171-177, 2004-09-30 (Released:2010-03-12)

著者

橋爪 烈

出版者

一般社団法人 日本オリエント学会

雑誌

オリエント (ISSN:00305219)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.54, no.1, pp.96-119, 2011-09-30 (Released:2015-02-27)

参考文献数

32

---

‘Aḍud al-Dawla (d. 372H/983) was the most powerful ruler of the Buwayhid Dynasty. This paper aims to examine his view of his royal lineage as expressed in Kitāb al-Tājī, which was written by Abū Isḥāq Ibrāhīm al-Ṣābi’ (d. 384H/ 994) at the express command of ‘Aḍud al-Dawla. It also aims to understand the book within the wider social and political context of the period when Buwayhid Dynasty was at its zenith. Section 1 provides an outline of the content of Kitāb al-Tājī and its background. The book was written when ‘Aḍud al-Dawla was just about to send a military expedition in 369H/980 against the Ziyārid and Sāmānid dynasties in the eastern regions of the ‘Abbāsid Caliphate. Section 2 establishes the noble lineage of the Daylam and the Jīl people by reconstructing the contents of Kitāb al-Tājī, which is now available only in an excerpt version. I compare the excerpt with some later sources that quote directly from the original text of Kitāb al-Tājī. These sources suggest that not only the Daylam but also the Jīl were connected with the Buwayhid Dynasty through a marriage alliance. Section 3 further analyses how the writing of Kitāb al-Tājī was affected by the ongoing conflict between the Buwayhid and the Ziyārid. When ‘Aḍud al-Dawla ordered Abū Isḥāq to write Kitāb al-Tājī, his underlying agenda was to present his lineage in order to justify his reign vis-à-vis the Ziyārid and their allies. In conclusion: (1) Kitāb al-Tājī reflected ‘Aḍud al-Dawla’s view of his own royal lineage, and, crucially, it was written under his supervision. (2) He portrayed himself as the converging point of the two noble lineages of the Daylam and the Jīl. (3) His purpose was to justify to his own army and to the Daylamite and Jīlite principalities the legitimacy of his reign just before lauching his military expedition against the Ziyārid of the Jīl.

著者

橋爪 烈

出版者

公益財団法人 史学会

雑誌

史学雑誌 (ISSN:00182478)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.112, no.2, pp.212-235, 2003-02-20 (Released:2017-12-01)

---

Historians seem to regard the institution of the Caliphate as one of the most important problems in the Islamic political history. Even after the dissolution of the 'Abbasid Caliphate, that institution was still the main source of power and legitimacy, as seen in the Mamluk and Ottoman dynasties. It is generally understood that in the mid-ninth century when the amir al-umara' took over temporal power from the 'Abbasid Caliph, the Caliphate was reduced to a mere political symbol, granting legitimacy to the provincial regimes that were rising in various places at that time. A critical re-examination of the political relationships among the Buwayhid rulers and between the Caliph and the Buwayhid rulers, however, reveals that authorization by the 'Abbasid Caliph came not always into effect as the root of their legitimacy. In the earlier period, Buwayhid rulers were amirs appointed by the Caliph as his provincial officers. Acquiring the riyasa, which was the leadership of the Buwayhid family, became more important in claiming legitimacy after the struggle for power within that family. As a result, 'Adud al-Dawla, having won the riyasa of Buwayhid family, was no longer an amir appointed by the Caliph, but established himself as a "malik", meaning the holder of "mulk (sovereignty)", which did not originate from the 'Abbasid Caliphate. Judging from the above, the authority of the Caliphate as a political symbol was not always absolute, but rather was one of the several resources by which provincial regimes could legitimize their domination. So, when studying the development of political institutions after the emergence of the Saljuqid dynasty, must take the existence of malik and mulk into consideration.

著者

橋爪 烈

出版者

公益財団法人史学会

雑誌

史學雜誌 (ISSN:00182478)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.114, no.6, pp.一一四六-一一四七, 2005-06-20

著者

橋爪 烈

出版者

公益財団法人史学会

雑誌

史學雜誌 (ISSN:00182478)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.110, no.9, pp.1741-1742, 2001-09-20

著者

橋爪 烈

出版者

山川出版社

雑誌

歴史と地理 (ISSN:13435957)

巻号頁・発行日

no.696, pp.1-15,図巻頭1p, 2016-08

著者

池上 俊一 加藤 玄 草生 久嗣 千葉 敏之 藤崎 衛 小澤 実 菊地 重仁 田付 秋子 橋爪 烈

出版者

東京大学

雑誌

基盤研究(B)

巻号頁・発行日

2013-04-01

---

本共同研究によって得られた成果は以下の3点にまとめられる、第一に、初期中世からルネサンスに至るまで、教皇庁の制度は、内外のコミュニケーションを通じて、ヨーロッパ全体の変動に対応するかたちで展開していた。第二に、イベリア半島から北欧・東欧に至るまで、ラテン・カトリック世界における普遍君主としての教皇庁の影響が、君主から地方に至るあらゆるレベルで確認された。第三に、ビザンツ帝国、イスラム政体、モンゴル帝国といったラテン・カトリック世界の外部との交渉を通じ、教皇庁はヨーロッパの世界認識ならびに自己認識を変化させた。

著者

橋爪 烈

出版者

早稲田大学イスラーム地域研究機構

雑誌

イスラーム地域研究ジャーナル (ISSN:1883597X)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.2, pp.25-34, 2010

著者

橋爪 烈

出版者

一般社団法人 日本オリエント学会

雑誌

オリエント (ISSN:00305219)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.49, no.1, pp.60-87, 2006-09-30 (Released:2010-03-12)

参考文献数

10

---

Mir'at al-zaman is one of the most enormous chronicles among Arabic historical works; it was written by Sibt ibn al-Jawzi in the 13th century. This work has been regarded as one of the most important sources of history contemporary with the author and has the further value of containing other historical works which have already been lost. Nevertheless, Mir'at remains unedited except for some small parts and has scarcely been examined philologically yet.Therefore, in this paper I examine Mir'at philologically and start on the classification of its manuscripts into groups.The first fruit of this paper, is a table of the 111 known manuscripts of Mir'at, together with their bibliographical information, I was able to classify many of the manuscripts as belonging to one of two groups, though many I have been unable to classify yet.I investigated the features of these two groups of manuscripts. As a result, it develops that one belongs to an abridged edition of Mir'at which was compiled by al-Yunini, the other belongs to an abstracted version which was compiled by an anonymous editor. Although the latter has been regarded as a copy of an original text of Mir'at in former research, I point out the error of this conclusion. I have been unable to discover any copy of the original text among the 111 manuscripts.Thus, as I point out, the manuscripts of Mir'at which have been used for historical research on medieval western Asia are not those of Mir'at itself, but are historical works abridged from original in a later period. In other words, medieval western Asian history has never been examined using Mir'at itself.

著者

橋爪 烈

出版者

日本イスラム協会

雑誌

イスラム世界 (ISSN:03869482)

巻号頁・発行日

no.74, pp.129-137, 2010-03

著者

橋爪 烈

出版者

The Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan

雑誌

オリエント (ISSN:00305219)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.48, no.1, pp.140-153, 2005

---

In this paper I deal with an unidentified manuscript held in the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Münich 378^c, which is a chronicle covering 402-436H, namely the latter part of the Buwayhid dynasty. This manuscript preserves the content of the chronicle of Hilal al-Sabi, almost all of which has been lost, and has therefore been used in the study of Buwayhid history. Because it is an unidentified manuscript, its value as a source is diminished. In this paper I was able to determine the author and title of Münich 378^c, and in that process it became clear that there is a problem of the manuscript line of <i>Mir'at al-Zaman</i>, and then I tried to organize this problem to.<br>In 1905 Amedroz examined Münich 378^c by comparing it with the manuscript of <i>Mir'at al-Zaman</i> Or. 4619, but he came to no conclusion about the relationship. First, I reexamined his work, and I demonstrated the reason why he did not conclude that Münich 378^c is a manuscript of <i>Mir'at al-Zaman</i>. Because, Or. 4619 is different from Münich 378^c with respect to contents and the number of articles.<br>Second, I compared Münich 378^c with manuscripts of <i>Mir'at al-Zaman</i> preserved in libraries of Istanbul, for example the libraries of Ahmet III and Köprülü. Münich 378^c and the manuscripts of <i>Mir'at al-Zaman</i> in Istanbul turned out to belong the same line of manuscripts. Namely, Münich 378^c is <i>Mir'at al-Zaman</i>, and the author is Sibt b. al-Jawzi.<br>Finally, in this paper I showed that <i>Mir'at al-Zaman</i> has two lines of manuscripts. Although this fact has been pointed out by Cl. Cahen and Li Guo, I demonstrated that problem of manuscript lines of <i>Mir'at al-Zaman</i> is more complicated than heretofore realized.