著者
菅原 圭 上松 幸一
出版者
京都文教大学
雑誌
臨床心理学部研究報告 = Reports from the Faculty of Clinical Psychology Kyoto Bunkyo University (ISSN:18843751)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.12, pp.141-153, 2020-03-31

In recent years, separation from both religion and Buddhist temples has been growing. The7th“Religious Influence Survey”Report (True Pure Land Buddhism Otani Movement Office Planning Department, 2014) gives a numerically-informed portrayal of the difficulty of maintaining Buddhist temples and of changes in the involvement of temple supporters. In the background of this phenomenon lie societal changes, including the trend toward the nuclear family, depopulation, decreasing population, and the advancement of science. Further, among public demands of Jodo Shinshu Buddhist monks, the “religious tint” is disappearing. Against this current reality, Jodo Shinshu Buddhist monks are continuing to take up the mantle of the priesthood. In this study, we administered the Szondi test to 11 male Jodo Shinshu Buddhist monks to investigate whether certain personality traits were more likely among those continuing to the priesthood. Our results showed that Jodo Shinshu Buddhist monks tend to be living with various conflicts. The influence of the environment was a major factor in this. It is highly possible that, since their environment is filled with a multitude of conflicts, it is causing these monks severe stress. At the same time, because these conflicts also constitute a defense for them, it is presumed that they may be dealing with conflicts that have not come to the fore.
著者
上松 幸一
出版者
京都文教大学
雑誌
臨床心理学部研究報告 = Reports from the Faculty of Clinical Psychology Kyoto Bunkyo University (ISSN:18843751)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.12, pp.125-138, 2020-03-31

The purpose of this study was to understand and examine the recognition of experts in Japan and overseas about the ethical issues of Szondi-test.Primary recognition of Szondi-test's ethical issue in forein countries is that Szondi-test is unscientific.On the other hand, in japan, primary ethical issues of Szondi-test are considered that (1) to use face photos of mental disease person and criminal, (2) in the first place, to utilize faces of person as a tools, (3) to be bad influences by presenting strong invasive stimulus photos to testee.There was also a side where it can't be said that it was ethical partially by the current state as a response to recognition of our country, but the all could think it couldn't be said non-ethics-like.And in our country, there are person who recognize that Szondi-test is unscientific. But we must be careful consider whether they all recognize Szondi test as unethical.With respect to invasiveness, although there are relatively many people who feel the problem, in comparison with other projective tests , there is no recognition that significantly strong.There are several aspects of invasiveness, and it was speculated that this study focused only on the stimulus intensity of the photos.