著者
中俣 友子 阿部 恒之
出版者
公益社団法人 日本心理学会
雑誌
心理学研究 (ISSN:00215236)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.87, no.3, pp.219-228, 2016 (Released:2016-08-25)
参考文献数
37
被引用文献数
3 2

Two experiments were conducted to assess litter control at a riverside location. Experiment 1 examined the effects of a security camera (presence/absence), past littering (presence/absence), and environmental features (tussock/plain ground/flowerbed). Two scenes containing combinations of these factors were presented. Participants chose the scene in which they felt it was to easier to litter. Participants also reported their emotional response to the presence/absence of a security camera and environmental features in scenes with litter. The results revealed that the presence of a security camera, no past littering, flowerbeds, and plain ground inhibited littering. Littering in the presence of a security camera facilitated discomfort, anger, and shame, and littering in flowerbeds caused discomfort, anger, shame, and sadness. Using a similar method, Experiment 2 addressed the particular effects of a security camera combined with other factors: past littering, environmental features, and signboards (no sign/sign with eyes/security camera images). The results demonstrated the effectiveness of a security camera, no past littering, flowerbeds, plain ground, signboards presenting eyes, and images from a security camera in preventing littering.
著者
中俣 友子 阿部 恒之
出版者
公益社団法人 日本心理学会
雑誌
心理学研究 (ISSN:00215236)
巻号頁・発行日
pp.87.14057, (Released:2016-05-10)
参考文献数
37
被引用文献数
6 2

Two experiments were conducted to assess litter control at a riverside location. Experiment 1 examined the effects of a security camera (presence/absence), past littering (presence/absence), and environmental features (tussock/plain ground/flowerbed). Two scenes containing combinations of these factors were presented. Participants chose the scene in which they felt it was to easier to litter. Participants also reported their emotional response to the presence/absence of a security camera and environmental features in scenes with litter. The results revealed that the presence of a security camera, no past littering, flowerbeds, and plain ground inhibited littering. Littering in the presence of a security camera facilitated discomfort, anger, and shame, and littering in flowerbeds caused discomfort, anger, shame, and sadness. Using a similar method, Experiment 2 addressed the particular effects of a security camera combined with other factors: past littering, environmental features, and signboards (no sign/sign with eyes/security camera images). The results demonstrated the effectiveness of a security camera, no past littering, flowerbeds, plain ground, signboards presenting eyes, and images from a security camera in preventing littering.
著者
中俣 友子 阿部 恒之
出版者
一般社団法人 廃棄物資源循環学会
雑誌
廃棄物資源循環学会誌 (ISSN:18835864)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.29, no.4, pp.304-308, 2018-07-31 (Released:2019-07-31)
参考文献数
24

本論は,著者が過去に行ったごみのポイ捨て対策のための研究 (実験室実験・現場実験) を紹介し,海洋ごみ対策に関してささやかな提言を試みたものである。実験室実験では,スライドを提示して一対比較でごみの捨てやすさを判断してもらった。現場実験では,宮城県仙台市と名取市の間を流れる名取川河畔に看板を設置し,ごみの量を実際に比較した。両実験とも,監視カメラの有無,先行ごみの有無,景観の違い (草むら・更地・花壇),看板の違い (無・目の絵・監視カメラ撮影画像) の 4 要因を検討した。その結果,監視性の確保,記述的規範への配慮,領域性の確保,情緒的ブレーキが有効なごみ対策になりうることが明らかになった。海洋ごみについても同様の対策が有効であると推測されるが,対策の対象地がごみに悩む現場にとどまらず,海の向こうにまで広がっていることが問題を複雑化している。