著者

吉村 斉

出版者

日本青年心理学会

雑誌

青年心理学研究 (ISSN:09153349)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.22, pp.45-56, 2010-08-31 (Released:2017-05-22)

被引用文献数

1

---

The present study examined whether the captain's leadership affects the club members' interpersonal skills and their adjustments to club activities in junior high school extracurricular athletic clubs, and whether the characteristics of club activities (such as individual sports and team sports) also affects the adjustment. The interpersonal skills were constructed of non-inclusive attitudes toward members of other small groups, active self-assertion, and egoistic self-assertion. Participants, 495 seventh-grade students belonging to athletic clubs at 6 junior high schools, completed a questionnaire. The following significant result was obtained: When diligent captains in team sports clubs were authoritarian, the members who were non-inclusive toward members of other small groups were more satisfied with the atmosphere in their clubs than when the diligent captains were non-authoritarian. We conclude that the relationship among characteristics of athletic club activities, club members' interpersonal skills and their captains' leadership style had a great influence on members' satisfaction to club activities.

著者

吉村 斉

出版者

学校法人高知学園 高知学園短期大学

雑誌

高知学園短期大学紀要 (ISSN:03894088)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.42, pp.1-12, 2012-03-21 (Released:2021-05-07)

---

本研究は、幼児期の道徳性と客観的状況理解との関係、およびその関係の性差や発達差を検討したものである。道徳性は善悪の判断に関するもので、動機論的判断と結果論的判断に分類された。加えて、客観的状況理解は自己の誤信念、他児の信念、他児の願望から構成されたものであった。調査参加者は44名の4歳児と33名の5歳児からなる合計77名の幼稚園児であった。本研究は個別面接法で実施され、以下の結果が得られた。4歳女児において、動機論的判断の傾向が強い子どもは、結果論的判断の傾向が強い子どもに比べると、他者の願望を不当に意地悪と捉えていた。他方、4歳男児や5歳児では道徳性による願望の違いは見られなかった。さらに、誤信念や信念においても、道徳性による違いは見られなかった。以上のことから、4歳女児において道徳性の発達が他児の願望の理解に影響を及ぼす要因であることが示唆された。

著者

吉村 斉

出版者

学校法人高知学園 高知学園短期大学

雑誌

高知学園短期大学紀要 (ISSN:03894088)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.32, pp.11-20, 2001-12-25 (Released:2021-05-07)

---

This study examined relationships between attributions to "theory of mind" and settling strategies in young children's conflicts. Subjects were 48 kindergartners. The research was conducted by the interview method. The following significant results were obtained. 5-year-old children, who could interpret a strong child's belief and wish correctly (BD-group), attributed his/her intention to no malice. But 4-year-old children attributed a strong child's intention to malice independent of the styles of attributions to "theory of mind". And 4-year-old children of the BD-group tried to quarrel with him/her. The above results suggest that the relationships between styles of the attribution to "theory of mind" and settling strategies in interpersonal conflicts are not applicable to 4-year-old children.

著者

吉村 斉

出版者

学校法人高知学園 高知学園短期大学

雑誌

高知学園短期大学紀要 (ISSN:03894088)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.31, pp.39-47, 2000-12-30 (Released:2021-05-07)

---

This study examined relationships between the causal attribution to rivals' behaviors and resolutions of conflicts in early childhood. Subjects were 49 kindergartners. The research was conducted by the interview method. They were explained the following stories. A child dispensed with his/her plaything and left the room. When he/she came back, he/she found that a strong child played with the plaything. They were asked the attribution to "theory of mind". The following significant results were obtained. Boys who attributed strong boy's behavior to malice tried to quarrel with him. But boys who attributed to no malice didn't. On the other hand, both girls who attributed strong girl's behavior to malice and girls who attributed to no malice didn't try to quarrel either. The above results suggest that the relationship between the attribution to "theory of mind" and resolutions of conflicts were applicable to boys. In order to resolute conflicts peacefully, children should attribute to the theory of mind correctly.

著者

吉村 斉

出版者

学校法人高知学園 高知学園短期大学

雑誌

高知学園短期大学紀要 (ISSN:03894088)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.29, pp.1-11, 1999-03-31 (Released:2021-05-07)

---

This study examined the developmental changes of young children's understanding of adversary's malice in a situation where they were provocated. 88 4-, 5-, and 6-year-old children were asked to select a strategy from 6 strategies which they would behave and estimate the degree of the adversary's malice. The following significant results were obtained. Whether the adversary 's intention was malicious or not, 6-year-old girls would assert their opinions positively. On the other hand, 6-year-old boys would avoid interpersonal troubles. In addition, when adversary's intention was not malicious, 6-year-old children estimated adversary's malice lower than 4- and 5-year-old children. These results suggest that 6-year-old children can understand the degree of adversary's malice exactly, but they cannot select different strategies according to his/her intention.