著者

宮田 加久子 安野 智子 市川 芳治

出版者

日本社会心理学会

雑誌

社会心理学研究 (ISSN:09161503)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.30, no.1, pp.21-34, 2014-08-18 (Released:2015-06-06)

参考文献数

43

被引用文献数

2

---

How do the news media stimulate political deliberation, political interest, and political knowledge? To compare the effects of online news with those of the traditional news media, we collected three types of data: a web-based survey, diary logs of mass media use, and access logs to news sites. The results showed that exposure to news media reinforced political interest and political deliberation. Online news use, however, facilitated only online deliberation, while exposure to TV and newspapers stimulated face-to-face conversation. In addition, online and TV news use had a direct effect on political knowledge. The results also showed that political conversation with the family had a direct effect on interest in politics and political knowledge, while political conversation with friends had a positive impact only on political interest. The implications of the findings were discussed in terms of how occasional political communication narrows the gap between the politically sophisticated and the less sophisticated.

著者

宮田 加久子 安野 智子 市川 芳治

出版者

日本社会心理学会

雑誌

社会心理学研究 (ISSN:09161503)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.30, no.1, pp.21-34, 2014-08-18

被引用文献数

2

---

How do the news media stimulate political deliberation, political interest, and political knowledge? To compare the effects of online news with those of the traditional news media, we collected three types of data: a web-based survey, diary logs of mass media use, and access logs to news sites. The results showed that exposure to news media reinforced political interest and political deliberation. Online news use, however, facilitated only online deliberation, while exposure to TV and newspapers stimulated face-to-face conversation. In addition, online and TV news use had a direct effect on political knowledge. The results also showed that political conversation with the family had a direct effect on interest in politics and political knowledge, while political conversation with friends had a positive impact only on political interest. The implications of the findings were discussed in terms of how occasional political communication narrows the gap between the politically sophisticated and the less sophisticated.

著者

市川 芳治

出版者

公正取引協会

雑誌

公正取引 (ISSN:04256247)

巻号頁・発行日

no.714, pp.72-77, 2010-04

著者

市川 芳治

出版者

The European Union Studies Association-Japan

雑誌

日本EU学会年報 (ISSN:18843123)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.2009, no.29, pp.104-122, 2009 (Released:2011-12-01)

被引用文献数

1

---

This article examines the integration of environmental policy into EU competition law while taking into account its “Modernisation” reform and the influence of the European Social Model.Seeking the reconciliation between environmental policy and competition law is essential to foresee the global competition enforcement in the future and specify the scope of competition law and the definition of competition itself. However, the debate on this theme has been premature in the EU and some leading cases and interpretations have just emerged.This article deals with this topic in four phases: First, there is a review of the recent “Modernisation” reform, which introduces the approach focusing on consumer welfare and economic efficiency in EU competition law. This way of thinking tends to exclude non-competition values including environmental protection.Second, there is an examination of the influence of the European Social Model, which introduces a wider interpretation of non-competition values in EU competition law. This leads to the conflict of “competition lawyer vs. EC lawyer” because the former stresses the pro/anti-competitive perspective and the latter facilitates the concept “mandatory requirement” from case law in the field of free movement.Third, there is a comparative analysis of the traditional interpretation and the newly emerged interpretation of each article in EU competition law.In Article 81(1) EC, cases like CECED comply with the “Modernisation” reform and are based on the economic analysis, but the Wouters case paves the way for taking into consideration the perspective on the conflict of constitutional norm between competition and environmental protection. Similar bifurcation is found in cases of Article 82 EC. Cases like DSD follow the economics-based interpretation while cases under Article 86(2) EC exemption underline the non-competition values like environmental protection. State aid rules allow the Member States' wide discretion on environmental policy, but the State Aid Action Plan launched by “Modernisation” reform introduces the economic analysis and narrows its discretion.Finally, this article presents the tentative theory concerning the conflict between environmental policy and EU competition law. This comprises two-way interpretations: the interpretation in the context of “Modernisation” reform and the interpretation in the context of the European Social Model. In the present, it is needed to grasp cases from this two-way perspective.

著者

市川 芳治

出版者

慶應義塾大学大学院法務研究科

雑誌

慶應法学 = Keio law journal (ISSN:18800750)

巻号頁・発行日

no.33, pp.135-180, 2015-10

---

論説1 はじめに2 問題意識 : プライバシー・ビッグデータ・競争法3 事例 : Facebook/WhatsApp欧州委員会決定4 検討 : 競争法の潜在力と限界5 日本法への示唆6 終わりにかえて

著者

市川 芳治

出版者

慶應義塾大学大学院法務研究科 ; 2004-

雑誌

慶應法学 = Keio law journal (ISSN:18800750)

巻号頁・発行日

no.46, pp.33-56, 2021-03