著者

高橋 真 箭内 任 渡邊 千恵子 栗原 由紀子 張 涛

出版者

尚絅学院大学

雑誌

尚絅学院大学紀要 (ISSN:13496883)

巻号頁・発行日

no.68, pp.57-72, 2014-12

著者

箭内 任

出版者

尚絅学院大学

雑誌

尚絅学院大学紀要 (ISSN:13496883)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.63, pp.1-15, 2012-07

---

The purpose of this paper is to reconsider Kant's philosophy of religion, and reconstruct it in the context of the modern secular society. In particular, I would like to consider this problem referring to "Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone"(1793). The first point that requires clarification is Kant's thought of "radical evil." The second argument concerns the theory of religion , especially of the concept of "evil" in reference to the secular society. So, it is concluded that it should be characterized from the point of the postmetaphysical thinking and the secular stage of modern age.

著者

箭内 任

出版者

東北哲学会

雑誌

東北哲学会年報 (ISSN:09139354)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.19, pp.47-60, 2003-04-30 (Released:2018-02-28)

著者

箭内 任

出版者

日本医学哲学・倫理学会

雑誌

医学哲学 医学倫理 (ISSN:02896427)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.22, pp.7-15, 2004-10-18 (Released:2018-02-01)

---

Although numerous attempts have been made by scholars to show what "person" is, little agreement has been reached. The purpose of this paper is to point out some of problems inherent in the arguments and review how the concept is treated from a Bioethical perspective. First, various arguments involving "person" in the field of Bioethics are surveyed. Most of these arguments pertain to the criterion of "person." These arguments originated in the works of Locke and Kant and are influenced by the characteristics of modern reason: self-consciousness, autonomy. Next, the two most recent arguments made by Beckmann and Secker are illustrated in order to clarify where the criterion of "person" is. Beckmann understands autonomy in terms of "the claim to the rights," whereas Secker rethinks autonomy from a viewpoint of "human's duty." The question now arises as to whether Beckmann concentrates autonomy as human's right to recognize person as "corpus" and if Secker might misunderstand it as autonomy caused by the other without much consideration of its public character. In both cases there must be something more to understanding autonomy as a whole. Therefore it is insufficient to grasp the concept of "person" only from autonomy. In discussing "person," we must avoid reducing it to a definition with a single meaning. We should ponder its difficulty and impossibility. Let us look deeper into "person," tracing the history of the concept of "person" now. For example, according to Sakaguchi, person (persona) once had the character of not only fixation but fluidization. Meaning that "person" has the character of interdependency and interrelationship in any society. In conclusion I will re-formulate the concept of "person" as the "topos" of the possibility of communication. Now "person" is given a new phase of meaning and will open the door to a totally different society which gives a "person" a new standpoint as a real key.

著者

箭内 任 Makoto Yanai

出版者

尚絅学院大学

雑誌

尚絅学院大学紀要 = Research reports of Shokei Gakuin College (ISSN:13496883)

巻号頁・発行日

no.69, pp.39-52, 2015-07-01

著者

箭内 任

出版者

尚絅学院大学

雑誌

尚絅学院大学紀要 (ISSN:13496883)

巻号頁・発行日

no.65, pp.15-27, 2013-07