- 著者
- Kyu Kim Darae Kim Sang-Eun Lee In Jeong Cho Chi Young Shim Geu-Ru Hong Jong-Won Ha
- 出版者
- The Japanese Circulation Society
- 雑誌
- Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- pp.CJ-18-0609, (Released:2018-12-15)
- 参考文献数
- 22
- 被引用文献数
- 12
Background: Infective endocarditis (IE) in cancer patients is increasing, but because little is known about it in these patients, we analyzed patient characteristics and outcomes and compared these factors in IE patients with and without cancer. Methods and Results: This retrospective cohort study included 170 patients with IE newly diagnosed between January 2011 and December 2015. Among 170 patients, 30 (17.6%) had active cancer. The median age of IE patients with cancer was higher than that of non-cancer patients. Nosocomial IE was more common in cancer patients. Non-dental procedures, such as intravenous catheter insertion and invasive endoscopic or genitourinary procedures, were more frequently performed before IE developed in cancer patients. Staphylococcus was the most common pathogen in cancer patients, whereas Streptococcus was the most common in non-cancer patients. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in cancer patients with IE (34.4% vs. 12.4%, P<0.001). IE was an important reason for discontinuing antitumor therapy and withholding additional aggressive treatment in nearly all deceased cancer patients. Conclusions: IE is common in cancer patients and is associated with poorer outcomes. Patients with IE and cancer have different clinical characteristics. Additional studies regarding antibiotic prophylaxis before non-dental invasive procedures in cancer patients are needed, as cancer patients are not considered to be at higher risk of IE.
- 著者
- Jung-Sun Kim Hancheol Lee Yongsung Suh Hui-Nam Pak Geu-Ru Hong Chi Young Shim Cheol-Woong Yu Hyun-Jong Lee Woong-Chol Kang Eun-Seok Shin Rak-Kyeong Choi Saibal Kar Jai-Wun Park Do-Sun Lim Yangsoo Jang
- 出版者
- 日本循環器学会
- 雑誌
- Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- pp.CJ-15-1134, (Released:2016-03-17)
- 参考文献数
- 28
- 被引用文献数
- 2 25
Background:The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcome after left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion in real clinical practice and compare between Amplatzer cardiac plug (ACP) and Watchman.Methods and Results:From October 2010 to February 2015, 96 successful LAA occlusion procedures were performed using either ACP (n=50) or Watchman device (n=46) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients (59 male; age, 65.1±9.4 years; CHADS2, 2.5±1.2; CHA2DS2-VASC, 3.9±1.6; HAS-BLED, 2.7±1.3). The procedure success rate was 96.8%. There were serious complications in 4 patients (4.1%; 2 cardiac tamponade, 1 device embolization, and 1 major bleed). The anticoagulation cessation rate after 6 weeks was 92.7%. During mean 21.9-month follow-up, the incidence of death, stroke, systemic embolization and major bleeding was 5.2%, 4.2%, 0% and 1.0%, respectively. On transesophageal echocardiography of 93 patients within 6 months after the procedure, 24 residual leaks were observed (25.8%; 2 mild, 18 moderate, and 4 major). Clinical outcome was similar for the 2 devices, but peridevice leakage was more frequent with the Watchman than the ACP.Conclusions:LAA occlusion was feasible in non-valvular AF patients with high risk of stroke and hemorrhage. The ACP and Watchman devices were similar in terms of procedural and clinical outcomes.