文献一覧: Hideya YAMAKAWA (著者)

6 0 0 0 OA シノペ : 通貨変造事件

著者: 山川偉也 Hideya Yamakawa
雑誌: 国際文化論集 = INTERCULTURAL STUDIES (ISSN:09170219)
巻号頁・発行日: no.36, pp.77-144, 2007-06-20

According to DL6, 20_21, Diogenes of Sinope, son of Hicesias the banker, counterfeited the state coinage; and when he was detected, according to some he was banished, while according to others he voluntarily quitted the city for fear of consequences. The anecdote has its immediate connection with Diogenes the Cynic's mission "παραχαραξον το νομισμα (Deface the currency"). But the scholars have suspected the truth of DL6, 20_21. However, in this paper I deface the current interpretations of DL6, 20_21 and submit another version consistent with Diogenes' cosmopolitan way of life.

2020-08-10 19:08:41
6 + 3 Twitter

http://id.nii.ac.jp/1420/00008027/

2 0 0 0 OA アリストテレスとディオゲネス

著者: 山川偉也 Hideya Yamakawa 桃山学院大学法学部
雑誌: 桃山学院大学総合研究所紀要 = ST.ANDREW'S UNIVERSITY BULLETIN OF THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE (ISSN:1346048X)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.33, no.1, pp.129-168, 2007-06-20

This article first takes a critical look at Aristotle's definition of "human being" as a "politicalanimal" (πολιτικον ζψον), as noted in his Politics 1253a2_3. Following that is a study of the correlation between Aristotle's and Diogenes' views of human beings. The author initially provokes the reader's attention to the fact that the Aristotelian term "political animal" originally had two contexts. First, according to Historia Animalium, the political animal is a species of "gregarious animal" (τα αγελαια). Therefore, it is not the case that human being is a unique species of political animal; a large group of different species described as political animals does indeed exist. Aristotle states, for example, that various forms of political animal, such as "man," "bee," "wasp," "ant" and "crane," each has a common property: the devotion to some common good in its political community. On the other hand, in Politics 1252a1_7, Aristotle identifies "the so-called city-state" (η καλουμενη πολιζ) as a "political community" (η κοινωνια η πολιτικη)_According to Historia Animalium, the human being is only one species of political animals. But, according to Politics 1253a 7_8, the human being is a "political animal" in a greater measure than bees or any other "gregarious animal". The author insists that it was precisely in this context that Aristotle needed to specify human beings by a geometrical proportion: `God :Man=Man : Animal.' The author analyzes thoroughly Aristotle's view of human being and discloses the fact that Aristotle's theory of the "natural slave" conflicts with his own definition of"man." In this way the author divulges the invisible aspects of Aristotle's political thought. The author then concentrates to clarify the meaning of Diogenes' mission "paracharaxon to nomisma" ("deface the currency") and to highlight the significance of his protest against the Aristotelian definition of human beings: God : Man=Man : Animal Thus, the author proceeds to deface the current interpretations of Diogenes of Sinope's conception of justice and cosmopolitanism, which has been regarded by scholars as almost "nothing"or at least as a "shadowy ancestor" of the cosmopolitanism of Zeno of Citium. In place of these interpretations the author is submitting another version of cosmopolitanism that is to be regarded as a defaced version of Alexander's. Following the Sinopean dog philosopher's mission"παραχαραξον το νομισμα" ("deface the currency"), the author is defacing contemporary views on Diogenes of Sinope's "character" (χαρακτηρ)_

2020-01-18 17:14:18
1 + 0 Twitter
1 + 1 Wikipedia

http://id.nii.ac.jp/1420/00001313/

2 0 0 0 IR 「世界市民」の論理と倫理(1)

著者: 山川偉也 Hideya YAMAKAWA
出版者: 桃山学院大学総合研究所
雑誌: 桃山学院大学総合研究所紀要 (ISSN:1346048X)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.26, no.1, pp.141-179, 2000-09

Momoyama-gakuin University aims primarily at fostering the cosmopolitans embracing Christianity who participate actively in the international affairs and contribute much to the community of nations so that build a new dimension of the cosmopolitan culture. But, why is the word 'cosmopolitan' connected with Christianity and what does it imply in the contexts of university curriculum? What at all is the origin of the word 'cosmopolitan' which might not always be positively evaluated? In regard to these questions, in a series of papers, I would like to delineate some significant circumstances concerning the origins and the essence of 'cosmopolitan' and 'cosmopolitanism.' The present paper in speciality examines some cosmopolitan characters in Marcus Aurelius, Quintus Septimius Florens Tertullianus, and Aurelius Augustinus and tries to classify the ideas of cosmopolitanism into four types which run parallel to the four categorical propositions in the traditional formal logic.

2017-03-15 20:10:09
2 + 0 Twitter

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110004734281

1 0 0 0 OA 西周『致知啓蒙』に見る西洋形式論理学の本邦への導入について(共同研究 : ことばと理論(II))

著者: 山川偉也 Hideya Yamakawa
雑誌: 総合研究所紀要 = ST. ANDREW'S UNIVERSITY, BULLETIN OF RESEARCH INSTITUTE (ISSN:09187758)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.19, no.3, pp.35-46, 1994-03-30

2023-01-26 17:09:14
1 + 1 Wikipedia

http://id.nii.ac.jp/1420/00008617/

1 0 0 0 IR パルメニデスとナーガールジュナ

著者: 山川偉也 Hideya YAMAKAWA 桃山学院大学文学部
出版者: 桃山学院大学総合研究所
雑誌: 国際文化論集 (ISSN:09170219)
巻号頁・発行日: no.21, pp.269-292, 2000-03

Investigating into the reality Parmenides the Eleatic philosopher drew a clear line between δοξα (belief) and αληθεια (truth) in his Πε〓ιψυσεω〓 (On the Nature). The fact immediately reminds us the distinction between samvrtisatya (conventional truth) and paramarthatya (absolute truth) which advocated and developed by Nagarjuna the founder of Madyamika (the Middle-Way School) philosophy. The similarity of their Denkmotiv suggests a significant parallelism between two great philosophers' Denkformen about the reality and time.