- 著者
-
Jesús Astigarraga
Juan Zabalza
- 出版者
- The Japanease Society for the History of Economic Thought
- 雑誌
- 経済学史研究 (ISSN:18803164)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.51, no.1, pp.1-18, 2009 (Released:2019-06-21)
- 参考文献数
- 20
This article focuses on the fate of Walras and Walrasian ideas in Spain, which should
be contextualised within the coming of marginalism to Spain. Traditionally, it has
been accepted that marginalism was almost forgotten by Spanish economists during
the period of 1870 to 1936. This statement held on to the idea that Spanish economists
did not contribute in almost any way to the theoretical heritage at the time.
However, this interpretation is misleading in that Spanish economists were well informed
about the advances of economic theory and that they applied them to solve
the problems of Spain’s economic backwardness. In particular, during the first third
of the twentieth century, the main Spanish economists used a generic version of ‘national
equilibrium,’ which was merely a simplified adaptation of the Walrasian notion
of equilibrium to the Spanish economy, for grappling with the problems of economic
development. Three economists in particular, Antonio Flores de Lemus, Romà Perpiñá
Grau and more specifically Manuel de Torres, used this version to support different
economic policies that were assumed to contend with economic backwardness.
In doing so, they contributed to the introduction of marginalism, and in particular,
Walrasian ideas into Spain.
JEL Classification: B 13, B 31, D 50.