著者

Hiroaki SHIMIZU Takahiro ONO Takatsugu ABE Masaaki HOKARI Yusuke EGASHIRA Koji SHIMONAGA Masahiko KAWANISHI Kyoko NOMURA Yusuke TAKAHASHI

出版者

The Japan Neurosurgical Society

雑誌

Neurologia medico-chirurgica (ISSN:04708105)

巻号頁・発行日

pp.2022-0249, (Released:2023-01-05)

参考文献数

21

---

Intracranial carotid artery dissection causing cerebral ischemia is a rare but important cause of cerebral infarction in children and adolescents. Although endovascular therapy has been reported to be effective, questions regarding the indications for intervention are yet to be addressed. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate factors related to clinical outcomes through a nationwide survey. Overall, 35 neurosurgical centers reported patients within 2 weeks after ischemic onset due to intracranial carotid artery dissection causing cerebral ischemia treated between January 2015 and December 2020. Data on clinical and radiological findings were statistically analyzed. Twenty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 36 years (range, 7-59 years), without sex differences. Headache at onset was documented in 60.7% of the patients. Dissection findings were categorized into stenosis (71.4%) or occlusion (28.6%). Initial treatments, including various antithrombotic agent combinations in 23 (82.1%) patients, effectively improved or prevented aggravation in half of the patients. The patients with stenotic dissection were significantly more likely to experience aggravation during the initial treatment than did those with occlusive dissection (P = 0.03). In addition, the patients with moderate to severe neurological deficits on admission had poorer outcomes at discharge more frequently than did those with mild neurological deficits on admission. Eight patients undergoing endovascular therapy had no procedural complications or further aggravation after intervention. In conclusion, patients with intracranial carotid dissection causing cerebral ischemia who had a stenotic dissection were at risk of further aggravation, and endovascular therapy effectively improved or prevented aggravation.

著者

Tsuyoshi Ohta Tetsu Satow Manabu Inoue Kanta Tanaka Junpei Koge Takeshi Yoshimoto Eika Hamano Taichi Ikedo Masatake Sumi Koji Shimonaga Yuji Kushi Hisae Mori Koji Iihara Masafumi Ihara Masatoshi Koga Kazunori Toyoda Hiroharu Kataoka

出版者

The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy

雑誌

Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy (ISSN:18824072)

巻号頁・発行日

pp.oa.2022-0018, (Released:2022-07-20)

参考文献数

17

---

Objective: To evaluate whether changes in the practice of mechanical thrombectomy could affect the clinical outcomes during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic.Methods: Patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy from April 2019 to March 2021 for anterior circulation proximal large artery occlusion in our institute were divided into two groups of pre- and post-COVID-19, with April 2020 assumed to be the start of the COVID-19 era with the first declaration of a state of emergency. We compared patient characteristics, proportions of patient selection depending on rapid processing of perfusion and diffusion (RAPID) CT perfusion, outcomes including treatment variables such as time and reperfusion status, and patient independence at 3 months.Results: Data for 112 patients (median age, 79 years; 44 females) were included in the analysis. A total of 50 patients were assigned to the pre-COVID-19 group (45%). More patients were selected with RAPID CT perfusion in the post-COVID-19 compared with the pre-COVID-19 (69% vs. 16%; P <0.001). Treatment details and clinical outcomes did not differ between the groups, including the door-to-puncture time (median [interquartile range], 66 [54–90] min vs. 74 [61–89] min; P = 0.15), proportions of significant reperfusion (82% vs. 87%; P = 0.60), and modified Rankin scale score of ≤2 at 3 months (46% vs. 45%; P >0.99). Multivariate logistic regression analysis for the clinical outcome of modified Rankin scale score of ≤2 at 3 months was performed and included the following factors: age, sex, the onset-to-door time, significant reperfusion, and pre- and post-COVID-19. The treatment period did not influence the outcomes (post-COVID-19 group, odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.34–1.85, P = 0.59).Conclusion: In the setting of a limited access to emergency MRI during the COVID-19 pandemic, RAPID CT perfusion was performed significantly more often. Changes in the practice of mechanical thrombectomy with the protected code stroke did not bring the different level of treatment and clinical outcomes as before.