著者
香 春 Xiangchun
出版者
名古屋大学人文学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大学人文学研究論集 = The journal of humanities, Nagoya University (ISSN:2433233X)
巻号頁・発行日
no.2, pp.205-227, 2019

Our aim is to clarify the significance and importance of Richards' theory of metaphor in his The Philosophy of Rhetoric (1936) for the history of metaphor-study. We can estimate him as a pioneer of the idea of "conceptual metaphor" in the sense of Cognitive Linguistics. I. A. Richards advocated a new philosophy of metaphor which consists of the principle of 'context' and the terminology of 'tenor' and 'media'. According to him the problems of metaphor concern not only the linguistic expressions but also our way of thinking. His terminology of 'tenor' and 'media' made a great leap in the history of metaphor-investigation because he pointed out the duality of metaphor phenomena by means of his terms. He thought that such a duality can be found not only in the linguistic expressions but also un the thoughts of our consciousness. He asserted that the metaphorical duality is a general principle which we can find in all the linguistic expressions and further in our abstract thinking even in the nonlinguistic level. Therefore we can conclude that the reason why there are metaphorical expressions is that our cognitive processes as perceiving, thinking and sensing are of metaphorical character, namely more or less 'analogical' and 'abstractive'.
著者
香春 Xiangchun
出版者
名古屋大学人文学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大学人文学研究論集 (ISSN:2433233X)
巻号頁・発行日
no.3, pp.221-250, 2020-03-31

Our aim in this paper is to investigate the core thought of "Happiness" (eudaimonia) in Aristotle's Ethica Nicomachea in order to elucidate the significance of his ethical thought in the age of globalization. Against common thought that the core opinion of Aristotle's ethics is rather 'communitarian', we have tried to interpret his thought as a kind of ethical theory that could fit the multicultural situation of our age. He characterized the notion of 'Happiness' as a kind of human 'proper' activity which would be controlled by human 'reason' (logos). He situated Happiness in the midst of 'our own authentic activity'. We drew a distinction between the 'Goodness for human being' and 'Goodness as a human being', both of which are expressed as "the human goodness". The former is Happiness and the latter is "virtue", and then the main problem of his ethics can be formulated as follows; how we realize our own happiness through 'virtue' as our own activity. According to our interpretation, the concept of his happiness as the final end of our life can be interpreted as ethically connected with Kantian notion of dignity of person as "Zweck an sich". We pointed out one of the most important features of Aristotle's ethics, namely that his ethical theory is very practical one. Aristotle suggested a real method of becoming to be virtuous through real exercise of accustoming oneself to do good things and to do well in moral sense. We can conclude that Aristotelian thought of morals contains in itself a theory of the real method through which we can become a 'good or virtuous person' and therefore we can assert that his ethical theory has kept its power as the most persuasive one even now.