著者

石 永峰

出版者

関西大学大学院東アジア文化研究科

雑誌

東アジア文化交渉研究 = Journal of East Asian cultural interaction studies (ISSN:18827748)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.13, pp.381-398, 2020-03-31

---

In October 1908 (Meiji 41st) , Nakamura Fusetsu published Ryuminjyo (『龍眠帖』) with his own style, "the Calligraphy of Six Dynasties" (Rikuchō Shofu, 六朝書風) . After two months, Ryuminjyo was criticized by some traditional scholars, such as Inukai Bokudo. The criticism became a special topic in the modern calligraphy theory, which referred to the contradictions between new stele study (碑学) and old rubbing study (帖学) . Some scholars and calligraphers, such as Inukai Bokudo, Naitō Konan and Kawai Senro, discussed the pros and cons with Nakamura's unconventional calligraphy and his calligraphy theory consequently. In particular, Naitō Konan discussed with Nakamura Fusetsu through the art magazines and newspapers, which continued for several years and influenced the calligraphic societies thereafter. In terms of Naitō Konan and the controversies over the stele study and rubbing study, this report goes through the perspective of cultural interaction, which based on the previous researches, focuses the disputation between Naitō Konan and Nakamura Fusetsu, by which using the new materials, and elucidates the standpoint of Naitō Konan and Nakamura Fusetsu. In addition, this report illuminates the difference of the Calligraphy of Six Dynasties between Nakamura Fusetsu and Naitō Konan, and how Naitō Konan judged Kusakabe Meikaku's theory on the Calligraphy of Six Dynasties.