著者
杉本 俊介
出版者
北海道大学大学院文学研究科応用倫理研究教育センター
雑誌
応用倫理 (ISSN:18830110)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.6, pp.35-50, 2012-10-01

In this paper, I will discuss Peter Singer’s answer to “Why be Moral?”. There have been many debates regarding the “Why be Moral?” problem. It is, however, still unclear whether at least one answer is correct. I take up and examine Singer’s argument. Firstly, I will provide a brief overview of the literature on the Why be Moral? problem, and place Singer’s contribution within the literature. Secondly, I claim that Singer’s argument from a meaning of life does not intend to provide everyone with the reasons for acting morally, as opposed to the standard interpretation. His 1973 article supports my claim. However, in fact, Singer requires us to be moral, which is an apparent contradiction to my interpretation. Lastly, I explain why it is not a contradiction.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

はてなブックマーク (2 users, 2 posts)

シンガーの思想にはあまり共感しないが、思考の過程は非常に明晰で、やはり現代哲学の泰斗なのだなと思う。

Twitter (20 users, 24 posts, 45 favorites)

ピーター・シンガーとWhy be Moral? 問題 杉本俊介(京都大学 https://t.co/gDbZDFUpGK
【悲報】ピーター・シンガー先生、我々がヴィーガニズムに従うべき理由は無いと考えている事が判明 https://t.co/uNubeAuSpH
ピーター・シンガーとWhy be Moral? 問題 https://t.co/gDbZDFUpGK

収集済み URL リスト