著者
コート マイクル 麻田 貞雄 Michael Kort Sadao Asada
出版者
同志社法學會
雑誌
同志社法學 = The Doshisha Hogaku (The Doshisha law review) (ISSN:03877612)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.60, no.6, pp.471-491, 2009-01-31

This article provides an overview of the scholarly debate concerning bombing of Hiroshima by the United States, focusing mainly on American historians. It traces the rise and eventual decline of the so-called revisionist school of historiography on the subject, which in its various forms challenged the thesis that the atomic bomb was necessary to force a Japanese surrender in 1945 and that the United States used the bomb for that reason. In particular, the article describes how scholarly works published since the early 1990s have demolished the main pillars of the revisionist argument, including the baseless "atomic diplomacy" thesis that the bomb was used to intimidate the Soviet Union and limit its postwar gains in Eastern Europe and Asia.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (2 users, 2 posts, 1 favorites)

@koike_youji 確かに、「修正主義」の語義もまだ御臓腑に落とし込まれてゐないやうですので、濫用なさり他人を中傷なさる前に御勉強なさつた方がよいかと思ひます。初歩的な文献を御紹介いたします。 マイクル・コート 2009「ヒロシマと歴史家:修正主義の興亡」『同志社法学』60(6). https://t.co/JVWv5Dea7F https://t.co/agNAnWTl14

収集済み URL リスト