- 著者
-
櫻井 一成
- 出版者
- 美学会
- 雑誌
- 美学 (ISSN:05200962)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.70, no.1, pp.37-48, 2019 (Released:2021-05-08)
Philosophers often liken living well to creating an art work. I call this conception
“poetics of life.” Hanna Arendt’s thought about human existence is very unique in that
she interprets poetics of life concretely and rejects it clearly. On the contrary, there are
few philosophers who concretize the metaphor and evaluate it negatively. In this paper,
by replying to her criticism, I try to develop poetics of life in the right direction.
The ground for her rejection to poetics of life comes from her famous typology of
vita activa. In The Human Condition (1958), Arendt divides human activity into three
types, namely “labor”, “work”/ “fabrication,” and “action.” Since Arendt categorizes
creation of art works into “work” and regards “action” as proper activity for human
being, she cannot accept the metaphor “to live well is to create a work of art.” However,
investigating detailed descriptions of examples of “action”, it is revealed that the general
explanation for the difference between “work” and “action” does not comprehend the
essential feature of “action”; the function of formation that integrates parts already
existing ad-lib. By this function, this paper will show that Arendt’s theory is capable of
containing the idea of “making one’s own life.”