著者
石郷岡 建
出版者
ロシア・東欧学会
雑誌
ロシア・東欧研究 (ISSN:13486497)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2006, no.35, pp.46-59, 2006 (Released:2010-05-31)

This article analyzed the so-called “Orange Revolution” in Ukraine. The “Orange Revolution” is widely understood by the western media and countries as a part of political, democratic changes in the former Soviet Union, and also very often called or mentioned as a “Democratic Revolution.” The author has a different opinion and a strong feeling of uneasiness to call it as a “Democratic Revolution.”However it is rather difficult to explain those changes such as The “Rose Revolution” in Georgia (2003), the “Orange Revolution” in Ukraine (2004), the “Tulip Revolution” in Kyrgys (2005), as simply a coincidental happening. There should be some explanation of similarities and should be a comparative analysis.From this point of view the author picked up the general election in Ukraine which was held in March, 2006, and made an analysis of political changes in Ukraine as a whole.The result of the analysis showed the following: 1) The most of the people in Ukraine have now a feeling of the disillusion by the “Orange Revolution.” 2) The political confrontation in the “Orange Revolution” were based on the geopolitical different direction of the West and the East. This confrontational pattern has not changed so much before and after the revolution. 3) The direction of the West and the East are completely opposite, and almost impossible to compromise. The Ukrainian society is divided by the West and the East, and the power balance is very narrow and full of the tension. 4) However the new element of political changes is now emerging within the Ukrainian society. Especially the economical changes based on the development of the market economy are now becoming more important for the Ukrainian politics, and should not be ignored.After the election in March, 2006, the former “Orange Revolution” coalition forces tried to establish a new government, but failed. Instead, the opposition pro-Russian forces with the leader of Mr. Jankovich, have succeeded to form a new government. This outcome can be also explained by the economical changes in Ukraine.After the collapse of Soviet Union the so-called socialism system were broken down one by one, but all the former socialist countries had same (or similar) problems and difficulties. Behind those problems and difficulties you can find out always the friction among the society because of the introduction of market economy. In this context it may be possible to find out the logics and rules of political changes in postsocialist countries based on the analysis of the economic developments. The author has a hypothesis that behind the “Color-Democratic” revolution the economic factor, especially the development of market economy has played a very important role.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (3 users, 3 posts, 0 favorites)

@gute012 @YKvptGHcbtdaUCC @KanAugust @cnn_co_jp また論点ずらしされるのも面倒なので、オレンジ革命時の選挙データを貼っておきます 逃げずに真正面から行きましょうや https://t.co/w1iBAHSWdU https://t.co/UwckNet3BX
ウクライナの 『カラー民主革命』をめぐる考察 ―2006年 の議会選挙 の分析をもとに― 石郷岡建 (日本大学総合科学研究所教授) https://t.co/9EmOiXoBrU
@iakiyama 知らない言葉でしたので、ちょっと調べてみました。 カラー革命 https://t.co/Gyay0LfieU その中の ウクライナについては 「ハンター・バイデンは、2014年から2019年まで、ウクライナの天然ガス会社であるブリスマ・ホールディングスの取締役を務めた[4]。この期間で月額5万ドル(約536万円)

収集済み URL リスト