著者
広瀬 裕子
出版者
日本教育政策学会
雑誌
日本教育政策学会年報 (ISSN:24241474)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.21, pp.25-46, 2014-07-15 (Released:2017-06-23)
被引用文献数
1

This paper inquires into the education reform case carried out using the method of New Public Management (NPM) in the London Borough of Hackney in the UK. During both the Conservative and the Labour Governments in the 1990s, education reforms with the NPM method were adopted widely. The Hackney case was an extreme case of them. The Hackney Council became the first local authority to be judged as failing in running local education, as a consequence, its power to deliver education services was removed from the Council by the central government to be transferred to a private company. Eventually, in 2002, and independent non-profit organization, the Hackney Learning Trust, took over all the power from the Council to run education, under a ten-year contract. Although the Learning Trust undoubtedly had improved the whole range of education in Hackney, the Trust was closed without extending the contract when the contract ended in 2012. The education services in Hackney were returned to the Council. In this NPM education reform case, it should be noted that the private company was not considered to be the permanent agent to deliver education in the local area, but a temporary effective operator to work intensively to recover the malfunctioning local authority. The closure of the successful Trust suggests that the Hackney case was not a simple case of NPM privatisation in educational administration, but this should be interpreted as a case of an education governance reform by the private sector in an emergency, in which the local government had lost their ability to improve their malfunctioning public services.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (2 users, 5 posts, 0 favorites)

読み進めていくと、教育行政を担っていた行政当局の失敗により、学校改革業務等を入札により私企業へ委託。その効果検証を経て、別の非営利の民間企業に教育行政権限を全面委託するという事例の様子。 すごいじゃん。。。ロンドン。このレポート面白いです! https://t.co/grjbm4dwxK
●参照論文  教育ガバナンス改革の有事形態 : ロンドン・ハックニー区に見られた私企業によるテイク・オーバー(乗っ取り)型教育改革https://t.co/grjbm4dwxK 3年契約で学校改革業務…とあるが、具体にどういった業務を委託したのか。普通の委託だと乗っ取り型とまでいえないと思うので、精読しよう。
本書の第一章では、「英国で見られる教育委員会機能そのものを包括的に民間部門に委託する仕組みの導入」について触れられていて、これどういったことを委託したの?と思い少し調べる。 参照論文はこちら→https://t.co/grjbm4dwxK >高見 茂 教育行政提要(平成版) https://t.co/s8JMfrWasv

収集済み URL リスト