著者
黒沢 良一
出版者
The Society of Instrument and Control Engineers
雑誌
計測自動制御学会論文集 (ISSN:04534654)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.28, no.6, pp.680-689, 1992-06-30 (Released:2009-03-27)
参考文献数
11
被引用文献数
3 4

The deadbeat control, also known as, finite time settling control is supposed to be effective exclusively in sampled data controls. In 1957, O. J. M. Smith proposed Posicast control to obtain the finite time settling response to a command input for continuous control systems. He mentioned in his paper the finite time settling response to a disturbance as well. His method is, however, impractical because inverse transfer functions of controlled objects would be required.The author has found out a new controller configuration with a delay element for continuous control systems, which has the finite time settling responses both to a step command input and to a step disturbance. This new method is named Continuous deadbeat Control (CdbC) and was published.This paper describes a design of CdbC. Conditions to realize controllers based on CdbC are shown, and the following is cleared. For a high order controlled object without unstable zeros, only one delay element is required in the controller independent of functions of a command and a disturbance.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (2 users, 2 posts, 1 favorites)

デッドビートコントロール、離散時間系で議論されがちだけど普通に連続時間系でも構成できるらしい でもこういう制御器ってモデル化誤差にすごい弱そうな印象があって使おうと思ったことがない(モデル化誤差が入ったら有限整定性がすぐに失われそう) https://t.co/8vcFnAll8Z
こういう地に足の付いた系の話は好きである。 コンティニュアスデッドビートコントロールの設計 https://t.co/oSjVCFyiuv

収集済み URL リスト