著者
西村 清和
出版者
美学会
雑誌
美學 (ISSN:05200962)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.53, no.4, pp.1-14, 2003-03-31

In his film "Strike", Eisenstein abruptly cuts from a shot of the slaughter of workers to one of the slaughter of a steer. Such a cutting is understood as a typical example of film metaphor, while it has been not incontrovertible among theorists whether it is a real metaphor. Do film metaphors or, more generally, visual metaphors exist in the world? We could enumerate three types of traditional theories of metaphor, i.e. the substitution, the comparison, and the interaction theory. These have a conception in common that metaphor is, just like synecdoche and metonymy, a relation between two things referred to by two words. Meanwhile, influenced by Max Black's epistemological view of metaphor, philosophers often use the word 'metaphor' in the expanded sense including 'analog-model' or 'symbol'. It is sure that an analog-model is a mode of recognizing the world based on the relation between two things. But metaphor is, we claim, nothing other than a linguistic phenomenon of predicative modification of a subject. If it is true, it follows that metaphor in its proper form can not appear at the dimension of such visual images as paintings and films.

言及状況

はてなブックマーク (3 users, 3 posts)

画像には統辞法が欠けていて「読む」ことができない、従って絵画的隠喩は不可能。

Twitter (8 users, 9 posts, 6 favorites)

よんどる 西村視覚的隠喩 http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110003714538
西村清和「視覚的隠喩は可能か」(http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110003714538)を読む限り、メタファーという語は(定義・依拠する先行学説をはっきりさせない限り)使わない方がいいな。アイコンとか記号とかにしようか。
でも視覚における提喩って何なんだろう。あっその前に西村清和さんによると「視覚的隠喩」でさえ怪しいんだったっけ? 論文「視覚的隠喩は可能か」を読み返さなくちゃ。http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110003714538

収集済み URL リスト