著者

赤江 達也

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

哲學 (ISSN:05632099)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.117, pp.69-88, 2007-03

---

特集記憶の社会学投稿論文1. はじめに : 政教分離訴訟の多様性2. 「憲法の戦後レジーム」の成立 : 政教分離訴訟の前提条件 2.1. 戦前と戦後のあいだ : プラカード事件 2.2. 憲法の諸理念 : 「反戦平和」・「信教の自由」・「政教分離」3. 違反と権利の同時発見 : 政教分離訴訟の出現 3.1. 最初の政教分離訴訟 : 津地鎮祭訴訟 3.2. 最高裁での敗訴と「天皇の影」4. 違反を問題化する論理 : 連鎖する政教分離訴訟 4.1. 「靖国問題」の磁場 : 浜松市政教分離原則侵害違憲訴訟 4.2. 政教分離訴訟のなかの断層 : 箕面忠魂碑訴訟5. おわりに : 政教分離訴訟の2つの論理This article describes and analyzes the emergence and transformation of `litigation for separation of religion and politics' in post-war Japan. Such constitutional cases started in the mid-1960's, spread out after the 1970's, and some of them are still going on. These cases are the same regarding the point of making an issue of the constitutional violation in question. But they are concerned with various points, such as religious acts undertaken by local governments (or public funding for religious events), enshrinement of the dead without the bereaved family's consent, and the prime minister's visits to Yasukuni Shrine. In this paper, I focus on the logic of the litigation, which is used to bring up the problem of violations of the constitution, as well as practices which support this logic. As a result of analysis, I point out that there is a subtle difference between the two types of logic employed; one applied when some initial litigation has begun, and another applied to give them political-and sometimes religious-meanings and to connect various cases. These two types of logic show the peculiar complicatedness of the relationship between religion and politics in postwar Japanese society.