著者

渡辺 和行

出版者

奈良女子大学

雑誌

奈良女子大学文学部研究教育年報 (ISSN:13499882)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.3, pp.49-62, 2007-03-31

---

School of Annales has contributed to deepen the historical studies and to spread the territories of historians since 1929. Historical studies have developped from a geographical history or a structural history (histoire totale) to an anthropological history (histoire des mentalites). The age of Annales are divided into four periods. The first is an time of founders, Lucien Febvre and Marc Bloch from 1929 to 1956. Fernand Braudel who had succeeded the direction of review "Annales" from Febvre leaded in the second period (1956-1969). Jacque Le Goff and Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie in succession of Braudel had conducted Annales from 1969 to 1989. Since 1989, the fourth generation of Annales, that is to say, Jacques Revel, Andre Burguiere, Roger Chartier, and Bernard Lepetit have been protagonists of social history. However in the 1980s, the historical studies have just confronted two difficulties which we call it "crises of history". One is a segmentation of historical researches and the other is a epistemological challenges of post-modernism, that is to say, linguistic turn. How does the forth generation of Annales think of crises of history? These are my probelmatiques that are needed to resolve.