著者

高橋 健夫 広瀬 祐司 米田 博行 増田 辰夫 上野 佳男

出版者

奈良教育大学

雑誌

奈良教育大学紀要 人文・社会科学 (ISSN:05472393)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.31, no.1, pp.p85-106, 1982-11

---

This paper deals with teaching methods for beginners' volleyball class. Two models of the methods were selected through analysing various ideas to improve skills and results of our previous experimental lessons. The characteristics of two models were as follows. (1) Model A was a game-center learning. In this model, each skill of underhand pass, overhand pass, service, spike, and team play was separately learned and after every lesson games were played as an actual practice of the learning. (2) Model C was a learning centered on the offensive combination skill. In this model, team plays were mainly learned with focus on the toss-spike skill. The hours alloted for the game were about half of the model A. (3) In both models, lessons were done by "small group learning", and games were played in accordance with a special rule allowing to contact the ball a maximam of 4 times before returning it to the opposite court. Two different classes (of the model A and C), each with 20 school hours, were executed by the same teacher in the first classes of a junior high school. The learning results of both models were evaluated by the skill test, the analysis of team plays during the games, and the investigation on the attitude of students to physical education class-the attitude was substantiated by a questionary (standardized by A. Kobayashi). The major findings are as follows. (1) Personal skills were well developed in both models. But, in the model A underhand pass skill and in the model C overhand pass skill were more developed. (2) The difference of rally times in a game was not observed between two models. However, the times of hiting ball in a game were more frequent in the model C. Especially, frequency of hiting ball 3 or 4 times in the same court was significantly higher in model C. (3) Also the offensive team plays (toss-spike) were observed more frequently in the model C, but the games of the model A were mainly played by underhand pass rallys. (4) As the results of investigation on the attitude to physical education class, model A obtained the evaluation "fairly successful", but could not get good scores concerning the items of human relationship. The evaluation of model C was "very successful".