著者
八幡 英幸
出版者
京都大学高等教育教授システム開発センター
雑誌
京都大学高等教育研究 (ISSN:13414836)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2, pp.113-121, 1996-06-30

この論文は国立情報学研究所の学術雑誌公開支援事業により電子化されました。
著者
八幡 英幸
出版者
熊本大学
雑誌
熊本大学教育学部紀要 人文科学 (ISSN:0454613X)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.60, pp.17-26, 2011-12-12

The aim of this paper is to reconsider the relation between narrative and the power of judgment in Kant's sense, among which has been pointed out to be a close relationship. The results of this study are as follows: on one hand, diverse studies on narrative theory have reached agreement on these points: (1)in narrative is found the connection between two different kinds of orders (i. e. the chronological one and the non-chronological one); (2)the formation or reformation of narrative is set off by some contingent elements or the lack of connection between them; (3)narrative enables our self-understanding and gives the foundation of personal identity. On the other hand, the power of judgment in Kant's sense has these characteristics: (1)it mediates between two different kinds of orders (i. e. the one of nature and the one of freedom) in the same field of experience: (2)it subsumes some contingent elements under a new order: (3)it is led by a sort of feeling of pleasure: (4)it has a foundation on our bodily nature: (5)it contains two different viewpoints (i. e. the one of human limited understanding and the one of another kind of understanding). As a conclusion, narrative and the power of judgment have come out to have in fact many similarities. The above points (1) and (2) are obviously, also the other points are in fact thought to be applicable to both these activities.
著者
八幡 英幸
出版者
熊本大学
雑誌
熊本大学教育学部紀要. 人文科学 (ISSN:0454613X)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.59, pp.141-149, 2010-12-03

本稿ではまず、カントとヘアをつなぐキーワード(言い換えれば、ヘアによるカント解釈のキーワード)である普遍化可能性 universalizability の原理に着目し、この原理と道徳判断 moral judgment がそこにおいて下される状況の特殊性 particularity との関係を検討していくことにする。According to R.M.Hare(1919-2002), one of the most eminent moral philosophers of the 20th century, who carries the spirit of Kantian universalism, every judgment must follow the principle of universalizability. On the other hand, moral universalism has been criticized as a mere illusion by communitarians, e.g.A.MacIntyre(1929-). In this paper, I will argue first that it is not to the point that the principle of universalizability disregards the particularity of situations, and then that there is a genuine difficulty in drawing a line between the morally important features of them and those which are unworthy of attention. In my opinion, this problem is no other than that which I.Kant(1724-1804) tried to solve in his Critique of the Power of Judgment (1790), so we must be able to receive many suggestions on this problem from this work.