著者

加賀 裕郎 Kaga Hiroo

出版者

京田辺

雑誌

同志社女子大學學術研究年報 = Doshisha Women's College of Liberal Arts annual reports of studies (ISSN:04180038)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.68, 2017-12-26

---

論文

著者

加賀 裕郎

出版者

同志社女子大学

雑誌

同志社女子大學學術研究年報 (ISSN:04180038)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.54, no.1, pp.185-202, 2003-12-25

---

研究ノート (Note)

著者

加賀 裕郎

出版者

教育哲学会

雑誌

教育哲学研究 (ISSN:03873153)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.2002, no.85, pp.26-30, 2002-05-10 (Released:2009-09-04)

参考文献数

6

著者

加賀 裕郎

出版者

教育哲学会

雑誌

教育哲学研究 (ISSN:03873153)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1984, no.49, pp.57-71, 1984-05-10 (Released:2009-09-04)

参考文献数

34

---

It seems that Dewey's theory of the aim of education stressing 'growth' as the ultimate aim of education, is widely known and to a certain degree recognized. On the other hand, the meaning of growth is still ambiguous so much so that it may even be regarded as a mere slogan in education-a catchword without cognitivemeaning. In fact, such a paradoxical situation is partly due to ambiguities in Dewey's theory of the aim of education criticized by essentialists and reconstructionalists. However, on close examination, it becomes clear that many criticisms are put forth because of serious misunderstandings concerning Dewey's theory of growth; Dewey's theory of growth as the aim of education was built on the basis of thephilosophical foundations of his thought, a fact ignored in criticisms mentioned above. Hence, in this paper I would like to clarify the structure of Dewey' s theory of the aim of education with special emphasis on two of its aspects : the ultimate aim and the general or comprehensive aim in education.

著者

加賀 裕郎

出版者

京都

雑誌

総合文化研究所紀要 (ISSN:09100105)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.31, pp.33-57, 2014

---

The main purpose of this paper is to find a clue to create the inclusive history of pragmatism by examining Misak's new study on this subject. The trait of Misak's version of the intellectual history of pragmatism consists in legitimating Peirce's pragmatism while as degrading James' pragmatism. And also she grasps pragmatism as a part of modern analytic philosophy, not as a development of German idealism. Four subjects are set up in order to achieve the purpose of this paper. First we survey the main types of the interpretation of the intellectual history of pragmatism, and position Misak's new research in them. Next, we adjudicate whether Peirce's pragmatism can be justified as representative of pragmatism in general in comparison with James' pragmatism. Third, we critically consider Misak's interpretation of the intellectual history of pragmatism. Finally, we specify the configuration of the interpretations of the intellectual history of pragmatism by analyzing pragmatist's conception of truth. Our analysis of these four areas leads to the conclusion that Misak's interpretation can not be justified. We would like to construct the history of pragmatism as efforts to integrate naturalism and historicism.論文 (Article)