著者
吉開 将人
出版者
Japan Society for Southeast Asian Studies
雑誌
東南アジア -歴史と文化- (ISSN:03869040)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2002, no.31, pp.79-96, 2002-05-30 (Released:2010-03-16)
参考文献数
51

Lingnan (Guangdong and Guangxi in China) and northern Vietnam have a long history of relation dating back to ancient times. However, after Vietnam's independence from China, the history of both areas came to have completely different meanings for both Chinese and Vietnamese historians. This article is an attempt to discuss the history of both areas as an unity, based mainly on recent archaeological studies.The topics discussed here are:(1) The conquest of the Lingnan area by the Qin dynasty began within one year after the unification of the Warring States and that northern Vietnam was outside of the Qin's conquest area.(2) The Nanyue kingdom established by Zhaotuo at the end of the third century B. C. in the Lingnan area had different control systems over different areas of the kingdom. Northern Vietnam was one of them.(3) Except that several artifacts belong to early Shang dynasty, all of the early dated findings related to Chinese cultural tradition, such as a bronze pot, coins and mirrors unearthened in northern Vietnam, are dated the Nanyue period, the second century B. C.(4) The significance of the Nanyue period as the starting point of political and cultural relation between Lingnan and northern Vietnam should be highly valued.(5) Official seals for special titles and other archaeological facts showing as continuation of local tradition indicate that political control over native leaders and the cultural tradition since the Nanyue period basically continued in these areas, even after the conquest of Nanyue by emperor Wudi of the Han dynasty in 111 B. C. until the middle of the first century A. D.Several historical issues during the first millennium A. D. and problems about the construction of self-image and historical identities by both Vietnamese and Cantonese historians after independence of Vietnam from China are also discussed.
著者
吉開 将人
出版者
東京大学東洋文化研究所
雑誌
東洋文化研究所紀要 (ISSN:05638089)
巻号頁・発行日
no.129, pp.1-51, 1996-02

曾侯乙墓是戦國早期大型墓葬的典型代表。該墓出土了一百多件銅戈和戟,其中有八十三件帶有"曾侯某"的銘文。根據銘文文字以及噐形的詳細分析比較,幾組銘文除排列組合不同之外,個體銘文筆劃和形状完全相同。據此推測,這些銅戈和戟的銘文有的極可能是用類似於印刷活字的"單字模"鑄造的。過去考古界幾乎没有注意到這個問題,通過這次研究工作,發現了該噐銘文鑄造方法并不是單獨的例外,還有如下相同材料:《越王者旨於賜矛》、《越王者□矛》、《越太子□□予》、《攻呉王夫差剣》、《曾侯乙鼎、簠》、《「荊暦鐘」》、《「秦王鐘」》、《秦公〓》、《陳侯因咨戈》、《燕侯〓鍨鉘》、《「邾越盟辭鎛」》、《「大王鐘」》等。除了《秦公〓》,包括曾侯乙墓銅兵噐在内,諸噐年代集中於春秋晩期至戰國早中期、公元前五~四世紀,并且主要發現於南方地區。由此認為,這些材料可以作為曾侯乙墓銅兵噐銘文用"單字模"鑄造的旁證。曾侯乙墓出土銅戈和戟,還有用同一個"模"鑄造的噐形。我們認為,如果從以上的觀點再進一步探討該噐羣的性質,同一個"字模"、"模"、"笵"鑄造的銅噐羣也可以歸納出来,由此解決它們制作組織的具體情況以及它的演變過程。