著者

林 正巳 實 清隆

出版者

公益社団法人 日本地理学会

雑誌

地理学評論 (ISSN:00167444)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.52, no.2, pp.97-101, 1979

---

Most of Japanese municipalities, which were incorporated first in 1899, have experienced annexation or consolidation. However, there are municipalities which have not been annexed by adjacent large municipalities. This symposium was intended to focus on the problems of such non-annexed small corporate units. In order to handle the problems, we must pay attention not only to their geographical location, but also totheir administrative, financial and historical background.<br> This symposium was carried on by two chairmen, four commentators, and ten speakers. Chariman: Osamu NISHIKAWA (Univ. of Tokyo) and Yoshio WATANABE (Tokyo Metropolitan Univ.), Commentators: Shoichi YOKOYAMA (Univ. of Ehime), Hideo TSUKADA (Univ. of Nara), Yasuo MASAI (Univ. of Tsukuba), and Naoki YOSHIZU (Univ. of Nagoya). We got the following ten reports.<br> 1. FUKUHARA, H.: Case Study of Waki-cho Bordering Hiroshima and Yamaguchi Prefecture.<br> 2. HIGAKI M.: Case Study of Yoshitomi-cho Adjacent to Nakotsu City, Ohita Prefecture.<br> 3. SAEKI, I.: Case Study of Fuchu-machi Adjacent to Hiroshima City, Hiroshima Prefecture.<br> 4. IDO, S.: Historical Approaches to Several Non-annexed <i>Muras</i> in Shiga Prefecture.<br> 5. SAKAGUCHI, K. MIZUYAMA, T. and KOTANI, M.: Case Study of Iwataki-cho, Kyoto Prefecture.<br> 6. YOKOTA, T.: Case Study of Kasugai-cho, Yamaguchi Prefecture.<br> 7. CHIBA, T.: Minami-kawahara-mura, Saitama Prefecture.<br> 8. OHISHI, T.: Demographical Approach to the Distribution of Non-annexed Municipalities.<br> 9. OGURI, H.: On the Changes in Communities with the Consolidation of Local Government.<br> 10. MIIDA, K.: Case Study of Some Non-annexed Small Corporate Units. Discussions were focused on the following points.<br> 1. Merits and demerits of the non-annexed municipalities<br> 2. Management and control of the budget of the municipalities<br> 3. Community sentiment and non-annexed municipalities<br> 4. Moderate scale of local government<br> 5. Connection with other local governments in terms of consolidation.

著者

林 正巳 實 清隆

出版者

The Association of Japanese Geographers

雑誌

地理学評論 (ISSN:00167444)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.52, no.2, pp.97-101, 1979-02-01 (Released:2008-12-24)

---

Most of Japanese municipalities, which were incorporated first in 1899, have experienced annexation or consolidation. However, there are municipalities which have not been annexed by adjacent large municipalities. This symposium was intended to focus on the problems of such non-annexed small corporate units. In order to handle the problems, we must pay attention not only to their geographical location, but also totheir administrative, financial and historical background. This symposium was carried on by two chairmen, four commentators, and ten speakers. Chariman: Osamu NISHIKAWA (Univ. of Tokyo) and Yoshio WATANABE (Tokyo Metropolitan Univ.), Commentators: Shoichi YOKOYAMA (Univ. of Ehime), Hideo TSUKADA (Univ. of Nara), Yasuo MASAI (Univ. of Tsukuba), and Naoki YOSHIZU (Univ. of Nagoya). We got the following ten reports. 1. FUKUHARA, H.: Case Study of Waki-cho Bordering Hiroshima and Yamaguchi Prefecture. 2. HIGAKI M.: Case Study of Yoshitomi-cho Adjacent to Nakotsu City, Ohita Prefecture. 3. SAEKI, I.: Case Study of Fuchu-machi Adjacent to Hiroshima City, Hiroshima Prefecture. 4. IDO, S.: Historical Approaches to Several Non-annexed Muras in Shiga Prefecture. 5. SAKAGUCHI, K. MIZUYAMA, T. and KOTANI, M.: Case Study of Iwataki-cho, Kyoto Prefecture. 6. YOKOTA, T.: Case Study of Kasugai-cho, Yamaguchi Prefecture. 7. CHIBA, T.: Minami-kawahara-mura, Saitama Prefecture. 8. OHISHI, T.: Demographical Approach to the Distribution of Non-annexed Municipalities. 9. OGURI, H.: On the Changes in Communities with the Consolidation of Local Government. 10. MIIDA, K.: Case Study of Some Non-annexed Small Corporate Units. Discussions were focused on the following points. 1. Merits and demerits of the non-annexed municipalities 2. Management and control of the budget of the municipalities 3. Community sentiment and non-annexed municipalities 4. Moderate scale of local government 5. Connection with other local governments in terms of consolidation.