著者
桑原 司 クワバラ ツカサ KUWABARA Tsukasa
出版者
東北大学文学会
雑誌
文化 (ISSN:03854841)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.60, no.3, pp.386-369, 1997-03

The Chicago School of Symbolic Interactionism (one trend of the Chicago Renaissance) represented by the works of Herbert Blumer,has been seen to be major alternative to functionalism and social system theory in American sociology. In addition,this approach also has been important in sociology as a critique of positivism. According to Blumer,from the standpoint of Symbolic Interactionism,the human society has to be recognized as dynamic by nature. By the way,what's the human society in his theory? To summarize his theory about this,it can be said as follows. In dyadic model of the actor and the other,both these two persons take each other into account. Taking another person into account means perceiving,defining and judging the other person and his/her action through self interaction. The fact that each of the two persons is taking the other into account is notable. For, it means that each two persons are brought into a relation of subject to subject and necessarily have to do taking into account of taking into account. According to Blumer,this taking into account of taking into account intertwines the actions of both into what he calls the joint action which is grasped as constituting human society in his theory. Then,human society in his theory means the association of various joint actions. In this article,we try to clarify the reason why the human society (the association of various joint actions) has to be recognized as dynamic by nature in Blumer's theory. In particular,try to do this in close relation to his concept self interaction.98Pに欧文要旨有
著者
荻野 弘之 早川 正祐 佐良土 茂樹 波多野 知子 三浦 太一 荒幡 智佳 桑原 司 赤堀 愛美 ロウ クリストファー チャールズ デイヴィド ヴォルフ フランシス フェラーリ ジョン ロング アンソニー
出版者
上智大学
雑誌
基盤研究(C)
巻号頁・発行日
2011-04-28

1980年代の「徳倫理学」の復興以来注目されているアリストテレス倫理学を、従来のように、単に『ニコマコス倫理学』だけで解釈するのではなく、『エウデモス倫理学』『大道徳学』『徳と悪徳について』といった(参照される機会が殆どなかった)複数の著作やヘレニズム時代の偽作との比較検討を含めて、成立史、影響史を立体的に考察する。この作業を通じて、「善美」「思慮」「幸福」「友愛」などの諸概念をめぐるアリストテレス倫理学を単なる一枚岩の体系としてではなく、複雑な可能性の芽を孕んだ思想の培養基として理解する道を開く。これによって最近の英米でのアリストテレス研究の水準に追いつくことが可能になった。