2 0 0 0 OA 量子力学の全体論的なアンサンブル解釈とベルの不等式
- 著者
- 白井 仁人
- 出版者
- 科学基礎論学会
- 雑誌
- 科学基礎論研究 (ISSN:00227668)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.49, no.1, pp.15-31, 2021 (Released:2021-12-14)
- 参考文献数
- 28
The ensemble interpretation (EI) of quantum mechanics has been proposed by physicists and philosophers (e.g., A. Einstein, K. R. Popper, and A. Lande). However, it is not accepted widely among modern scientists. This is because the EI is regarded as a kind of the hidden variable theories. The scientists believe that the EI is inconsistent with violation of Bell's inequalities. The present paper points out that there are various types of the EI. Several of them can be consistent with the violation. The non-local type of the EI proposed by Shirai in 1998 is also consistent. We call it “holistic ensemble interpretation (HEI).” The non-locality in the HEI includes a temporal non-locality (i.e., a future dependence), implying that the present distributions depend on the future conditions. The concept of the future dependence would be so controversial that we discuss it deeply in the latter half of the paper. Many scientists may think of it as a doubtful concept, because it disagrees with the concept of “free will.” However, there are several reasons why we should consider the future dependence.
2 0 0 0 OA 量子力学, 統計力学, 統計学における不確定性関係
- 著者
- 白井 仁人
- 出版者
- 科学基礎論学会
- 雑誌
- 科学基礎論研究 (ISSN:00227668)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.33, no.2, pp.59-67, 2006-03-25 (Released:2009-07-23)
- 参考文献数
- 4
1 0 0 0 OA 量子力学の理論形式に関する統計解釈
- 著者
- 白井 仁人
- 出版者
- 科学基礎論学会
- 雑誌
- 科学基礎論研究 (ISSN:00227668)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.32, no.2, pp.99-104, 2005-03-25 (Released:2009-07-23)
- 参考文献数
- 2
1 0 0 0 OA 量子力学における運動量の概念と統計解釈
- 著者
- 白井 仁人
- 出版者
- 日本科学哲学会
- 雑誌
- 科学哲学 (ISSN:02893428)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.38, no.1, pp.63-78, 2005-07-25 (Released:2009-05-29)
The statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics is based on Einstein's idea that a state function does not represent an individual system but describes an ensemble of similarly prepared systems. It has been believed that the statistical interpretation is inconsistent with the NO-GO theorems. However, as shown in the present paper, the statistical interpretation is consistent with the theorems, when we change the concept of momentum, energy, and spin. We discuss whether it is possible or impossible to regard momentum, energy, and spin as characteristics of statistical ensembles of similarly prepared systems.