著者

石原 悠子

出版者

立命館大学

雑誌

若手研究

巻号頁・発行日

2021-04-01

---

本研究ではニーチェや後期ハイデガー、ガダマー、またフィンクらが展開した西洋近現代における遊びの哲学との比較研究を通して、京都学派における「遊びの哲学」の内実を明確化することを目的とする。具体的には、西田幾多郎・西谷啓治・上田閑照における「遊び」に関する論述を、「自己」「他者」「世界」という三つの問題圏において検討する。このことを通して京都学派の哲学が遊びの哲学に寄与しうる可能性について問う。

著者

石原 悠子

出版者

西田哲学会

雑誌

西田哲学会年報 (ISSN:21881995)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.12, pp.170-174, 2015 (Released:2020-03-21)

著者

石原 悠子

出版者

西田哲学会

雑誌

西田哲学会年報 (ISSN:21881995)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.11, pp.76-92, 2014 (Released:2020-03-22)

---

While Nishida critically engaged with the neo-Kantians (especially Cohen, Windelband and Rickert) in his earlier works, it was only later—in his 1926 essays, “Basho” and “The Neglected Problem of Consciousness”— that he engaged with Emil Lask’s philosophy. This article attempts to explicate the reason why Nishida referred to Lask during this period, viz. the period when the idea of “basho” was developed, and to clarify the nature of Lask’s influence on Nishida. The article begins with a general overview of the “last neo-Kantian”, Emil Lask’s philosophy, the focus being on the objectivist tendencies in his thought. Then, Nishida’s explicit references to Lask’s ideas—“transoppositional object”, the objectivism regarding form and the “domain category”—are analyzed. The article argues that Lask’s main influence on Nishida was not his idea of the “domain category” as such, as others have argued, but Lask’s logical objectivism, i.e. the anti-subjectivist tendencies in Lask’s thought. Finally, it is argued that Nishida appealed to Lask during this period because it resonated with one of the implications of the idea of basho—a complete turn away from the subjectivist tendencies of (neo-)Kantian philosophy.