著者
稲垣 朋子 Inagaki Tomoko イナガキ トモコ
出版者
大阪大学大学院国際公共政策研究科
雑誌
国際公共政策研究 (ISSN:13428101)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.19, no.2, pp.17-36, 2015-03

This paper examines the issue of joint custody after separation/divorce. Joint custody was provided for by Article 1671 of the German Civil Code in 1997. I have investigated the actual situation of joint custody and its support in Germany. Visitation and the right of parents to information about the child are also considered in relation to joint custody. Finally, taking into account the results of the study, this paper goes on to consider what is needed to introducing joint custody to Japan.
著者
稲垣 朋子 イナガキ トモコ Inagaki Tomoko
出版者
大阪大学大学院国際公共政策研究科
雑誌
国際公共政策研究 (ISSN:13428101)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.16, no.1, pp.243-264, 2011-09

In Japan, one of the parents exercises parental authority after divorce (§818Ⅲ, §819 Civil Code). But many of the western countries practice joint custody after divorce. Influenced by the western countries, some groups in Japan are initiating actions to realize joint custody. Recently, discussions on reforming legislation have increased. In this paper, I have selected Germany as a main object of comparison and analyzed precedents after reform in 1997. The purpose of this study is to observe from analyzing the case law of Germany the criteria to exercise joint custody. Especially, I have examined the following points: 1) suitability as a parent, 2) cooperation between parents, 3) tolerance of the relationship between the child and the other parent, 4) support towards the development of the child, 5) continuity of the living environment (status quo) of the child, and 6) the child’s will. I have dealt with points 1)-2) in this part.
著者
稲垣 朋子
出版者
三重大学
雑誌
若手研究(B)
巻号頁・発行日
2014-04-01

本研究では、離婚後の親権行使及び面会交流のあり方を、共同親権制度を視野に入れつつ再検討を行った。その際には、共同親権が認容されない(されるべきでない)単独親権の場合においては、子の福祉をいかなる方法で保障していくべきかという側面にも目を向けた。ドイツ法を比較対象としながら、共同親権制度下での親権行使及び面会交流の態様と、単独親権制度下でのそれらとの溝が何であるかを裁判例及び実態より明らかにし、日本における離婚後の共同親権のあり方を考察した。
著者
稲垣 朋子 イナガキ トモコ Inagaki Tomoko
出版者
大阪大学大学院国際公共政策研究科
雑誌
国際公共政策研究 (ISSN:13428101)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.16, no.2, pp.135-163, 2012-03

In Japan, one of the parents exercises parental authority after divorce (§818III, §819 Civil Code). But many Western countries practice joint custody after divorce. Influenced by these countries, some groups in Japan are initiating actions to achieve joint custody. Recently, discussions on reforming legislation have increased. I have selected Germany as a main object of comparison and analyzed precedents after reform in 1997. The purpose of this study is to observe, by analyzing the case law of Germany, the criteria for exercising joint custody. I have dealt with the following points in this part : 3) tolerance of the relationship between the child and the other parent, 4) support towards the development of the child, 5) continuity of the living environment (status quo) of the child, and 6) the child's will. I have also examined "the change model", in which the child changes his/her abode between parents periodically. Finally, taking into account the results of the study, this paper goes on to consider what types of joint parenting are desirable and possible in Japan.