著者
赤岩 順二
出版者
一般社団法人情報処理学会
雑誌
研究報告電子化知的財産・社会基盤(EIP) (ISSN:09196072)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2013, no.5, pp.1-7, 2013-11-14

サイバー犯罪におけるプロバイダーの責任制限 (責任範囲) を提案する各種ガイドラインにおいて、刑法上の緊急避難概念が参照されることがある。ネット上自殺告知された事例について、電気通信事業法が規定する通信の秘密の侵害の罪 (電気通信事業法 4 条 1 項、その刑罰規定同 179 条) に該当する削除を正当化 (違法阻却) する基準と手順を提案するガイドラインなどである。本論文では、緊急避難の法的性質論をあらためて確認し、プロバイダーの責任分界における緊急避難法理の適用範囲について検討する。Japanese ISPs associations proposed guidlines setting standards and procedures for lifting secrecy of communications in internet environment. Some of these guidlines refer "Notstand(Necessity)", for immunity of criminal responsibility( mainly as violating secrecy of communications, defined in Article 4 of the Telecommunications Business Law (Law No. 86 of December 25, 1984)). In this paper, considering the legal nature of Notstand(Necessity), I examine what extent Notstand(Necessity) is valid in setting standards and procedures for marcations of ISPs' criminal responsibility.
著者
赤岩 順二
出版者
日本法哲学会
雑誌
法哲学年報 (ISSN:03872890)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2006, pp.219-228,258, 2007-10-30 (Released:2010-12-16)
参考文献数
47

This essay offers an interpretation of Plato's Nomoi 842b-860e, from agricultural laws to the answer of Athenian Stranger who was himself raising the question whether legisla-tive activities are recommended or not. There are three parts in the essay. The first part (section I) shows that the agricultural legislation is well designed and could be seen as a prototype for the rest of legislation. The second part (section II) shows that the legislative story, from the beginning of Book IX to an objection by Cleinias (857 b), is regarded as an error, which shows a possi-ble misbehavior of criminal justice in a post agricultural society. The third and final part (section III) discusses about the question whether judicial and legislative activities themselves are included in the subject of a Socratic paradox, “No one willingly do wrong”, introduced by Athenian Stranger (860 d). This essay answers “yes”, according to interpretations in the first and second part of the study. If that is the case, Plato assigns the Socratic paradox to a roll preventing the deviance of criminal justice.