1 0 0 0 OA ハトにおける階層的複合刺激の部分優先処理効果
- 著者
- 関口 勝夫 牛谷 智一 実森 正子
- 出版者
- 日本動物心理学会
- 雑誌
- 動物心理学研究 (ISSN:09168419)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.61, no.1, pp.95-105, 2011 (Released:2011-07-15)
- 参考文献数
- 29
- 被引用文献数
- 1 1
Two experiments investigated the processing of global and local information by pigeons. In Experiment 1, pigeons were trained to discriminate four hierarchical stimuli composed of two letters at global level and two other letters at local level. Color frames predicted the level to be tested in the subsequent two-alternative forced-choice test. The pigeons learned to discriminate the global/local compound stimuli and then showed successful transfer to the stimuli composed of novel letters that were irrelevant to the subsequent test. In Experiment 2, new pigeons were trained with the stimuli that had relevant letters only at one level. The local-relevant and global-relevant stimuli appeared in alternating daily sessions, so that the daily context allowed attention to be directed to the appropriate level. Performances on probe trials for the familiar training stimuli and novel global/local compound stimuli were compared under the context-consistent and context-inconsistent conditions. The tests revealed a cognitive precedence for local information of the compound stimuli.
1 0 0 0 OA ヒトと動物の空間情報獲得と行動選択
- 著者
- 関口 勝夫 牛谷 智一 澤 幸祐
- 出版者
- THE JAPANESE SOCIETY FOR ANIMAL PSYCHOLOGY
- 雑誌
- 動物心理学研究 (ISSN:09168419)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- pp.69.2.1, (Released:2019-04-15)
- 参考文献数
- 22
We review use of multiple landmarks in navigational behavior by humans and nonhuman animals focusing on three important aspects of spatial learning and cognition: Cognitive map, spatial integration, and configuration of multiple landmarks. Animals use multiple strategies for spatial navigation rather than a single strategy and flexibly choose an appropriate strategy in accordance with each environmental condition. Concerning the goal searching in humans, for example, whether it is based on information from multiple landmarks or from just one landmark would depend on the salience of the landmarks. Our conclusion is that it is more important what strategies or spatial information animals choose under what conditions than whether or not they have and use the strategies.