5 0 0 0 IR 日本産カシ類に寄生するアブラムシの2新属
- 著者
- 高橋 良一
- 出版者
- 大阪府立大学
- 雑誌
- Bulletin of the University of Osaka Prefecture. Ser. B, Agriculture and biology (ISSN:03663353)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.8, pp.1-7, 1959-03-15
1 0 0 0 OA ガラス文字作成ソフトウェア 二次元画像からのボリュームモデリングとその直接レンダリング
- 著者
- 高橋 良一
- 出版者
- 芸術科学会
- 雑誌
- 芸術科学会論文誌 (ISSN:13472267)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.3, no.3, pp.205-206, 2004 (Released:2008-07-30)
- 参考文献数
- 2
ペイント系ソフトで文字画像を作成するだけで,ガラス文字画像を生成するソフトウェアを出品する。本ソフトウェアは,二次元画像から三次元データを生成しレンダリングする。三次元データはボリュームモデリングデータであり,陰解法で直接レイトレーシングする。
1 0 0 0 アメンボー類の觀察及水棲半翅類の水中生活の起原
1 0 0 0 OA ティリッヒにおける宗教間対話の問題
- 著者
- 高橋 良一
- 出版者
- 宗教哲学会
- 雑誌
- 宗教哲学研究 (ISSN:02897105)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.16, pp.81-93, 1999 (Released:2019-03-20)
In this essay I attempt to show Tillich’s tendency towards the interreligious dialogue and its significance. Tillich was aware of the significance of interreligious dialogue very early. On the assumption of a dialogue between representatives of two different religions, Tillich points out four presuppositions. ① Both should acknowledge the value of the other’s religious conviction. ② Each of them should be able to represent his own religious basis. ③ There should be a common ground which makes dialogue possible. ④ There should be the openness to criticism. The third and fourth presuppositions are derived from Tillich’s thought of revelation. Tillich thinks revelatory events as revelatory correlation. Revelation must be received and everyone can participate in revelatory correlation. This possibility of acceptance of revelation is a common ground of interreligious dialogue. The significance of dialogue is derived from the truth of the knowledge of revelation. Its truth is to be judged by criteria within the dimension of revelatory knowledge. Tillich gives the criteria of revelation in the light of Jesus as the Christ, that is, uninterrupted unity with the ground of his being and the continuous sacrifice of Jesus to the Christ. This self-negation is criticism to idolatry. In a dialogue, mutual criticism is transformed into self-criticism. The significance of a dialogue consists in this criticism. Tillich insists Christianity has openness and receptivity. He affirms the uniqueness and superiority of Christianity from the principle of criticism which is deprived from Jesus as the Christ. Tillich’s apologetic theology contains the tendency towards the interreligious dialogue.