- 著者
- Ko Yamamoto Hiroki Shiomi Takeshi Morimoto Hiroki Watanabe Akiyoshi Miyazawa Kyohei Yamaji Masanobu Ohya Sunao Nakamura Satoru Mitomo Satoru Suwa Takenori Domei Shojiro Tatsushima Koh Ono Hiroki Sakamoto Kiyotaka Shimamura Masataka Shigetoshi Ryoji Taniguchi Yuji Nishimoto Hideki Okayama Kensho Matsuda Kenji Nakatsuma Yohei Takayama Jun Kuribara Hidekuni Kirigaya Kohei Yoneda Yuta Imai Umihiko Kaneko Hiroshi Ueda Kota Komiyama Naotaka Okamoto Satoru Sasaki Kengo Tanabe Mitsuru Abe Kiyoshi Hibi Kazushige Kadota Kenji Ando Takeshi Kimura on behalf of the OPTIVUS-Complex PCI Investigators
- 出版者
- The Japanese Circulation Society
- 雑誌
- Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- pp.CJ-22-0837, (Released:2023-03-11)
- 参考文献数
- 11
- 被引用文献数
- 5
Background: There is a paucity of data on the effect of optimal intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with standard PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with multivessel disease.Methods and Results: The OPTIVUS-Complex PCI study multivessel cohort was a prospective multicenter single-arm study enrolling 1,021 patients undergoing multivessel PCI including the left anterior descending coronary artery using IVUS aiming to meet the prespecified criteria for optimal stent expansion. We conducted propensity score matching analyses between the OPTIVUS group and historical PCI or CABG control groups from the CREDO-Kyoto registry cohort-3 (1,565 and 899 patients) fulfilling the inclusion criteria for this study. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularization. In the propensity score-matched cohort (OPTIVUS vs. historical PCI control: 926 patients in each group; OPTIVUS vs. historical CABG control: 436 patients in each group), the cumulative 1-year incidence of the primary endpoint was significantly lower in the OPTIVUS group than in the historical PCI control group (10.4% vs. 23.3%; log-rank P<0.001) or the historical CABG control group (11.8% vs. 16.5%; log-rank P=0.02).Conclusions: IVUS-guided PCI targeting the OPTIVUS criteria combined with contemporary clinical practice was associated with superior clinical outcomes at 1 year compared with not only the historical PCI control, but also the historical CABG control.