- 著者
- Ichiro Umemura Shunsuke Eguchi Yohei Morita Hironobu Mitani Kazuma Iekushi Takao Kato
- 出版者
- The Japanese Circulation Society
- 雑誌
- Circulation Reports (ISSN:24340790)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- pp.CR-23-0066, (Released:2023-09-21)
- 参考文献数
- 30
Background: Triple combination therapy with a renin–angiotensin system modulator, a β-blocker, and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist is currently recommended for patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. However, there is limited evidence on the extent to which triple combination therapy is currently prescribed to patients at the time of discharge from hospital in Japan.Methods and Results: Japanese patients hospitalized for HF (n=3,582) were evaluated in subgroups defined by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using anonymized claims and electronic health record data. At discharge, triple combination therapy prescription rates were low (40.4%, 30.0%, 20.8%, 14.0%, and 12.5% for patients with LVEF <30%, 30–<40%, 40–<50%, 50–<60%, and ≥60%, respectively). Advanced age, lower levels of B-type natriuretic peptide, and renal impairment were all significantly associated with lower rates of triple combination therapy use in the overall population. There were no significant differences in rehospitalization rates between LVEF subgroups; however, triple combination therapy use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of rehospitalization for HF in patients with LVEF <30%, 30–<40%, and 40–<50%.Conclusions: The use of triple combination therapy was significantly associated with a lower risk of rehospitalization for HF within 1 year of discharge in patients with LVEF <30%, 30–<40%, and 40–<50%. However, patients were undertreated with triple combination therapy.
- 著者
- Hironobu Mitani Kota Suzuki Junya Ako Kazuma Iekushi Renata Majewska Salsabil Touzeni Shizuya Yamashita
- 出版者
- Japan Atherosclerosis Society
- 雑誌
- Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis (ISSN:13403478)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.30, no.11, pp.1622-1634, 2023-11-01 (Released:2023-11-01)
- 参考文献数
- 32
- 被引用文献数
- 6
Aims: The study aimed to investigate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement rates in patients receiving LDL-C-lowering therapy using recent real-world data, following the 2017 revision of the Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases (JAS GL2017). Methods: Patients with documented LDL-C test results were extracted from the Medical Data Vision claims database between July 2018 and June 2021 and divided into three groups according to JAS GL2017: primary prevention high risk (Group I, LDL-C goal <120 mg/dL), secondary prevention (Group II, LDL-C goal <100 mg/dL), and secondary prevention high risk (Group III, LDL-C goal <70 mg/dL). Results: The mean LDL-C value was 108.7 mg/dL (n=125,235), 94.4 mg/dL (n=57,910), and 90.6 mg/dL (n=33,850) in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. Intensive statin monotherapy (pitavastatin, rosuvastatin, or atorvastatin) was the most frequently prescribed lipid-lowering treatment (21.6%, 30.8%, and 42.7% in Groups I, II, and III, respectively), followed by ezetimibe (2.5%, 7.1%, and 8.5% in Groups I, II, and III, respectively). LDL-C goals were achieved by 65.5%, 60.6%, and 25.4% of patients overall in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. Achievement rates were 83.9%, 75.3%, and 29.5% in patients prescribed intensive statin monotherapy and 82.3%, 86.4%, and 46.4% in those prescribed statin and ezetimibe combinations in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. In Group III, the proportion of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia prescribed statin and ezetimibe combinations achieving LDL-C goals was low (32.5%). Conclusions: The proportion of patients achieving LDL-C goals for secondary prevention in the high-risk group remains low even with statin and ezetimibe combination therapy.