著者

成瀬 翔 NARUSE Sho

出版者

名古屋大学文学部

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 哲学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.63, pp.61-74, 2017-03-31

---

John Seale claims that human society are based a special rules: constitutive rules. Constitutive rules have form of ʻX counts as Y in context Cʼ, and are characterized as constituting social facts. For example, bills in the wallet are physically only pieces of paper. However, certain type of paper counts as bills in our society. Seale asserts constitutive rules are foundation to create such a social fact. But, the problem is acts of ʻcounts asʼ. Searle is assumed this act as a primitive concept. In order to explain this act, I will compare the Kendall Walton and Searle, and try to clarify the constitutive rules. The contents of this paper are as follows. In Section 1, I will survey Searleʼs discussion and consider concepts of constitutive rules and social facts. In Section 2, I will introduce Waltonʼs theory of make-believe. In Section 3, I will compare the Searle and Walton, and point out the differences between them.

著者

成瀬 翔 NARUSE Sho

出版者

名古屋大学文学部

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

no.63, pp.61-74, 2017

---

John Seale claims that human society are based a special rules: constitutive rules. Constitutive rules have form of ʻX counts as Y in context Cʼ, and are characterized as constituting social facts. For example, bills in the wallet are physically only pieces of paper. However, certain type of paper counts as bills in our society. Seale asserts constitutive rules are foundation to create such a social fact. But, the problem is acts of ʻcounts asʼ. Searle is assumed this act as a primitive concept. In order to explain this act, I will compare the Kendall Walton and Searle, and try to clarify the constitutive rules. The contents of this paper are as follows. In Section 1, I will survey Searleʼs discussion and consider concepts of constitutive rules and social facts. In Section 2, I will introduce Waltonʼs theory of make-believe. In Section 3, I will compare the Searle and Walton, and point out the differences between them.

著者

成瀬 翔 NARUSE Sho

出版者

名古屋大学人文学研究科

雑誌

名古屋大学人文学研究論集 (ISSN:2433233X)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1, pp.153-166, 2018-03-31

---

This paper discusses concepts of ‘political theology’ and ‘the political’ of Carl Schmitt. Schmitt was a conservative German legal, constitutional, and political theorist. Schmitt is often considered to be one of the most important critics of liberalism. But the significance of Schmitt’s political concepts is subject to controversy, mainly due to his intellectual support for The Third Reich. In particular, ‘the political’ seems to approve the war and confrontation. But this paper argues that political theory and concepts of ‘political theology’ and ‘the political’ of Schmitt make an important contribution in modern democracy and political philosophy. The contents of this paper are as follows. First, in section 1, I will reconstruct the discussion of ‘state of exception’, ‘decision’ and ‘sovereign’ in Political Theology. Schmitt argues that the essence of a law will become apparent in its state of exception. I think Schmitt’s idea was influenced by Thomas Hobbes and Juan Donoso Cortés. Next, in section 2, I discuss ‘the political’ in The Concept of the Political. Schmitt regarded ‘the political’ as ‘friend-enemy distinction’. I take it that ‘the political’ or ‘friend-enemy distinction’ is limited to Just War. In section 3, I discuss that Schmidt criticized liberalism. Finally, I will clarify the relationship between the order and the state on Schmitt’s theory.

著者

成瀬 翔 Naruse Sho

出版者

名古屋大学哲学会

雑誌

名古屋大学哲学論集 (ISSN:09156577)

巻号頁・発行日

no.2018, pp.69-87, 2018-04

著者

成瀬 翔 NARUSE Sho

出版者

名古屋大学人文学研究科

雑誌

名古屋大学人文学研究論集 (ISSN:2433233X)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1, pp.153-166, 2018-03-31

---

This paper discusses concepts of 'political theology' and 'the political' of Carl Schmitt. Schmitt was a conservative German legal, constitutional, and political theorist. Schmitt is often considered to be one of the most important critics of liberalism. But the significance of Schmitt's political concepts is subject to controversy, mainly due to his intellectual support for The Third Reich. In particular, 'the political' seems to approve the war and confrontation. But this paper argues that political theory and concepts of 'political theology' and 'the political' of Schmitt make an important contribution in modern democracy and political philosophy. The contents of this paper are as follows. First, in section 1, I will reconstruct the discussion of 'state of exception', 'decision' and 'sovereign' in Political Theology. Schmitt argues that the essence of a law will become apparent in its state of exception. I think Schmitt's idea was influenced by Thomas Hobbes and Juan Donoso Cortés. Next, in section 2, I discuss 'the political' in The Concept of the Political. Schmitt regarded 'the political' as 'friend-enemy distinction'. I take it that 'the political' or 'friend-enemy distinction' is limited to Just War. In section 3, I discuss that Schmidt criticized liberalism. Finally, I will clarify the relationship between the order and the state on Schmitt's theory.