著者

畝部 俊也 UNEBE Toshiya

出版者

名古屋大学文学部

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 哲学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.57, pp.19-39, 2011-03-31

---

Śivatāṇḍava-stotra is a Sanskrit hymn of praise to the Lord Śiva in the Hindu religious tradition. It has beenvery popular in India and is famous for its high literary grace. And it is traditionally ascribed to Rāvaṇa, the rivalof Rāma who is the hero of one of the two cerebrated Indian epics, Rāmāyaṇa.This article presents a Japanese translation of this hymn with annotation. The Rāmāyaṇa (chapter 7, section16) narrates the account of how Rāvaṇa became a devotee (bhakta) of Śiva and how he came to sing the hymn tohim. This episode is also translated in this article.The hymn describes many mūrti (forms) of Śiva related to his various mythological episodes. The annotationexplains these related episodes and the visual representations as well.

著者

成瀬 翔 NARUSE Sho

出版者

名古屋大学文学部

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 哲学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.63, pp.61-74, 2017-03-31

---

John Seale claims that human society are based a special rules: constitutive rules. Constitutive rules have form of ʻX counts as Y in context Cʼ, and are characterized as constituting social facts. For example, bills in the wallet are physically only pieces of paper. However, certain type of paper counts as bills in our society. Seale asserts constitutive rules are foundation to create such a social fact. But, the problem is acts of ʻcounts asʼ. Searle is assumed this act as a primitive concept. In order to explain this act, I will compare the Kendall Walton and Searle, and try to clarify the constitutive rules. The contents of this paper are as follows. In Section 1, I will survey Searleʼs discussion and consider concepts of constitutive rules and social facts. In Section 2, I will introduce Waltonʼs theory of make-believe. In Section 3, I will compare the Searle and Walton, and point out the differences between them.

著者

宮原 勇 MIYAHARA Isamu

出版者

名古屋大学文学部

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 哲学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.61, pp.45-73, 2015-03-31

---

It has been widely admitted that the main text of Husserliana Bd. X is very difficult to interpret consistently because of its compilation. The first version of the main text appeared in one of the Jahrbuch (1928) collected from various Husserl's manuscripts written in a comparatively wide period, and edited by Edith Stein and Martin Heiddeger in an arbitrary way. At last in the year 2013, the PhB version of Husserliana Bd. X was published by Rudolf Bernet with a long introduction, in which he confirms the date of each manuscript. So we investigate the textual genesis of it and the whole structure and relations of the problems concerning the time-consciousness on the basis of such a textual criticism. Especially we propose a new interpretation of the diagram of time-consciousness of §10 and its text, namely; Husserl's famous diagram originated in the diagram drawn by Franz Brentano, which we can know through the report by Carl Stumpf. We conclude that it is impossible to understand the phrase 'die stetige Reihe der Ordinaten' in the text of §10 without knowing Brentano's diagram.

著者

金山 弥平 Kanayama Yasuhira (Yahei)

出版者

名古屋大学文学部

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 哲学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.43, pp.65-76, 1997-03-31

著者

辻 佐保子

出版者

名古屋大学文学部

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 哲学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.29, pp.89-128, 1983-03-31

著者

金山 弥平 金山 弥平

出版者

名古屋大学

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 哲学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.48, pp.19-33, 2002-03-31

著者

山田 弘明

出版者

名古屋大学

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 哲学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.49, pp.5-24, 2003

著者

神塚 淑子 KAMITSUKA Yoshiko

出版者

名古屋大学文学部

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 哲学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.60, pp.57-83, 2014-03-31

---

At the beginning of the Tang Dynasty (the mid-7th century), the disputes between Taoism and Buddhism has been actively carried out. At that time, as against Buddhist scripture “Wenshi jing (温 室経)”, Taoist scripture “Xiyu jing (洗浴経)” was created by Taoist Li Rong (李栄). In Chapter 1, I examine the contents of “Wenshi jing” and the custom of xiseng (洗僧) in the Tang Dynasty which was based on the teachings of the scripture. In Chapter 2 and Chapter 3, the contents of Dunhuang manuscript “Taishang lingbao xiyu shenxin jing (太上霊宝洗浴身心経)”, which is estimated “Xiyu jing (洗浴経)”, are examined and I make it clear that they stand on the Taoist thought of the Six Dynasties and Sui Dynasty. In Chapter 4, I consider Taoist scripture “Taishang xuandu miaoben qingjing shenxin jing (太上玄都妙本清静身心経)”, which includes similar contents as “Taishang lingbao xiyu shenxin jing (太上霊宝洗浴身心経)”.

著者

田村 均 Tamura Hitoshi

出版者

名古屋大学文学部

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 哲学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.59, pp.1-34, 2013-03-31

---

This paper has two purposes. One is to introduce Kendall Walton's theory of representational arts to the Japanese philosophical community. His theory is highly original in that it reveals the fact that the representational works of arts, such as paintings, sculptures, films, plays and novels, are to be regarded as being functionally the same as playthings, such as dolls, hobbyhorses, toy trucks and teddy bears. The theory depends on distinctive use of such concepts as games of make-believe, props, and representations. I try to make it clear what these concepts are meant to serve for. In doing this, I also try to give an overview of the role of imaginative activities as the foundation for our intellectual and emotional understanding of the world. This is the other purpose of this paper. According to Walton's view, dolls, toy trucks and works of arts, which serve for props of our games of make-believe, prompt us to imagine a fictional world where we have them as real things. An object in the real world can be turned into an item in an imaginary world that is different from itself-in-the-real-world. It should be real, however, in this fictional world. So we can take ourselves living with multiple realities in view of a Waltonian theory of make-believe. We would have an unexpected revelation of reality by artistic appreciation regarded as a kind of children's games of make-believe. In this sense, fiction-making capacity emerges as something very important and essential to human beings.

著者

佐々木 重洋 SASAKI Shigehiro

出版者

名古屋大学文学部

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 哲学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.52, pp.75-95, 2006-03-31

---

Hanamatsuri, one of Japanese traditional folk festivals which has attracted scholars and tourists, in famous for its elaborated rituals and dances. It is well known that various masqueraders come out and perform mythical stories in this festival. Although several reports of these masqueraders and their masks have been published, original first-hand data on these masks is still inadequate. This paper aims to offer ethnographic descriptions on the masks of Hanamatsuri festival and make a small contribution to Hanamatsuri studies as well as to study on Japanese masking tradition. Ethnographic descriptions here are based on my fieldwork done in Futto, Toei town, Aichi prefecture. In this paper, I report how people treat or handle their masks at Hanamatsuri festival today. I also would like to give some analyses on topics concerning with these masks, such as mutual relationships among these masks, their setting places in the sacred Kanbeya room, procedure of setting them up for the festival and other traditional customs for keeping and using these masks. Thus this paper offer some points of view for connecting Hanamatsuri studies with anthropology of masks and masquerades.

著者

田村 均 TAMURA Hitoshi

出版者

名古屋大学文学部

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 哲学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.58, pp.1-29, 2012-03-31

---

John Searle argues in his seminal paper of fictional discourse that the author of a work of fiction pretends to perform a series of illocutionary acts. He does not make it very clear, however, how one could make a pretended performance of an illocutionary act, e.g. an assertion: he does not tell us what else should be done in order to make a pretended assertion in addition to uttering an assertive sentence. The analysis of truth in fiction put forward by David Lewis may seem to give a plausible account of the meaning of fictional discourse; but his theory also contains the concept of pretence as a primitive notion of its explanatory components. Gregory Currie criticizes the Searlean pretence theory of fiction and advocates a communicative approach to the problem of fictional utterance. He introduces the idea of make-believe instead: the author of a fiction intends that the audience make believe her story. In his communicative approach it seems to be taken for granted that we know what it is to induce someone to make believe something and how it can be carried out by a speaker. Pretence or its equivalent, makebelieve, appears in these theories as a fundamental but unexplained frame of mind that constitutes the essence of fictional discourse. It is suggested that pretence or make-believe may be a primitive equipment of human mind like belief or truth inasmuch as storytelling and playacting can be seen everywhere in human life.

出版者

名古屋大学文学部

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 哲学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.63, pp.5-18, 2017-03-31

著者

嶋田 義仁 SHIMADA Yoshihito

出版者

名古屋大学文学部

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 哲学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.61, pp.173-184, 2015-03-31

---

Sein und Zeit is a phenomenological ontology thinking about existential mind experiences, different from the transcendental philosophy guided with a purely reflexive thinking. Its far ancestor is Hegelian Phenomenology of Spirit. Hegel tried to restore the totality of human mind sharpened into reason by Kant. Absolute spirit is the highest for him and philosophy is almost over religion, while in Kant's philosophy reason stayed on the domain of human capacity. In this sense, Hegel was atheist. European Middle Age thinking was dominated by Augustin's theology considering this secular world is nothing, because God is the being and the best like Sun. European humanist philosophers should fight against this theology to restore human being. This evolution was realized by Descartes: he declared 'I think, therefore I am'. Man got being. How can we live in this world without God? This became a common subject for men of the modern world. Recognizing the most important value in Man (Homme), J. J. Rousseau considered the realization of Man in the history is the most important humanist object to realize. The notion of man is however too abstract and too homogenous, being too universal, for human being in the reality driven by various emotions, various reasons is heterogeneous and specific one.

著者

橋本 哲 HASHIMOTO Satoshi

出版者

名古屋大学文学部

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 哲学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.62, pp.1-33, 2016-03-31

---

Certainty is one of the themes which Wittgenstein was interested in. His thoughts are left in the form of notes named On Certainty. He has put down in it a series of remarks on the usage of such words as ʻknowledgeʼ, ʻdoubtʼ, ʻbeliefʼ, ʻcertaintyʼ, etc. and the foundation of language-games related to them. I try in this paper to illuminate how the ordinary language-games about knowledge, doubt, belief, etc. relate with ʻunshakeable things (Moore-type propositions (Marie McGinn), hinges (Danièle Moyal-Sharrock))ʼ. Certainty belongs to ʻunshakeable thingsʼ that underlie all our ordinary language-games. Knowledge and certainty belong to different layers of our epistemic capacities (different categories). McGinn showed that Moore-type propositions can not be used in epistemic context. Moyal-Sharrock showed that hinges are rules of grammar and that they can manifest themselves only in what we say and do. But they could not definitely distinguish the certainty of the ʻunshakeable thingsʼ from their causes.

著者

山下 龍二 YAMASHITA Ryuji

出版者

名古屋大学文学部

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 哲学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.24, pp.57-65, 1977-03 (Released:2018-02-19)

著者

畝部 俊也 UNEBE Toshiya

出版者

名古屋大学文学部

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 哲学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

2011-03-31

著者

山田 弘明

出版者

名古屋大学

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 哲学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.46, pp.23-34, 2000-03-31

著者

山田 弘明 YAMADA Hiroaki

出版者

名古屋大学文学部

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 哲学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.52, pp.1-25, 2006-03-31

著者

山田 弘明

出版者

名古屋大学

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 哲学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.48, pp.1-18, 2002-03-31

著者

金山 弥平

出版者

名古屋大学

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 哲学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.42, pp.25-52, 1996-03-31