著者

山下 宏明 Yamashita Hiroaki

出版者

名古屋大学人文学研究科

雑誌

名古屋大学人文学研究論集 (ISSN:2433233X)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1, pp.473-492, 2018-03-31

---

We have trided to find when and who edited "Taiheiki". But this time I have devided Taiheiki into three parts, the first of which was edited depending on "Heike Talese". But narratologicaly speaking , it is a kind of rewrite of "Heikemonogatari". I have been reading "Taikeiki" as a tale. This paper depends on Narratology.

著者

山下 宏明 YAMASHITA Hiroaki

出版者

名古屋大学文学部

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

no.62, pp.215-232, 2016

---

I am very sorry that I didn't know the new edition had included "Drunken" in the 8th volume. I wondered if it is right, I could not think so. The question was the reason, why the new edition put the "Drunken" in the "Marching Saints". I tried to think about the reason. It is very difficult to answer the question. It is the Hotta's problem about nation and religion.

著者

山下 宏明 YAMASHITA Hiroaki

出版者

名古屋大学人文学研究科

雑誌

名古屋大学人文学研究論集 (ISSN:2433233X)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.2, pp.301-337, 2019-03-31

---

The most forcalized problem about “Taiheiki” has been “How Taiheiki has been produced?” since “Nan Taikeiki” Imagawa Ryoshun’s opinion. How Taiheiki has been kept adding and cutting. This problem will still keep continuing on. But I think we should find a new problem, “How to read Taiheiki just as Genji Tale or Heikemonogatari have been”. In this paper I started to research “How to read the tale of the struggle between Nitta clan and Ashikaga clan”. We have called the part “The starting second part of Taiheiki”. Taiheiki is a historical tale as Heikemonogatari is. Narratologically speaking, I found a lot of problems. I will still take a few years to arrive at the end of Taiheiki.

著者

山下 宏明 Yamashita Hiroaki

出版者

名古屋大学人文学研究科

雑誌

名古屋大学人文学研究論集 (ISSN:2433233X)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1, pp.473-492, 2018-03-31

---

We have trided to find when and who edited “Taiheiki”. But this time I have devided Taiheiki into three parts, the first of which was edited depending on “Heike Talese”. But narratologicaly speaking , it is a kind of rewrite of “Heikemonogatari”. I have been reading “Taikeiki” as a tale. This paper depends on Narratology.

著者

山下 宏明 YAMASHITA Hiroaki

出版者

名古屋大学文学部

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 文学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.63, pp.149-166, 2017-03-31

---

After the defeat of the war, Taiheiki has been neglected because of the imperialism, royal authority, duraing the war. After the the war, Taiheiki was estimated by study of history, not as a tale. So the main theme of the study has been about the research of the thought of the author. They had not studied as a tale but as a historical material. They looked for a hisrorical material. But this time I was surprised to find that much of the text was woven as a tale. I have tried to read the text as a tale based on Heikemonogatari. I believed to read it as a woven text based on Heikemonogatari.

著者

YAMASHITA Hiroaki 山下 宏明

出版者

名古屋大学文学部

雑誌

名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 文学 (ISSN:04694716)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.63, pp.149-166, 2017-03-31