著者
ブレンソド(斉英)
出版者
内陸アジア史学会
雑誌
内陸アジア史研究 (ISSN:09118993)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.28, pp.53-74, 2013-03-31 (Released:2017-10-10)

In this article, as a part of the study on the social structure of the Qing era Mongolian banners, the author discusses the way of assigning "da tabunangs (chief tabunangs)" and their functions in the Qaracin banners of Inner Mongolia. In the Qaracin banners "da tabunangs" were assigned to each sub-group of tabunangs who belonged to the same patrilineal line. The author studied the duties of "da tabunangs" by classifying them into two categories: duties at ordinary times and duties at the time when legal actions were launched. During ordinary times, "da tabunangs" performed such duties as compiling and reporting the genealogical tables of the tabunangs under their jurisdiction and reporting the names of tabunangs who "left home to become monks", heirs of noble titles and the financers of the emperor. Furthermore, they were responsible for reporting and investigating tabunangs' criminal actions and inquiring into the presence of tabunangs who defected from their communities or who gave shelter to illegal Chinese immigrants. On the other hand, on the occasions when legal actions were launched, they were obliged to conduct investigations into relations to tabunangs for the banner court. Then it was observed that da tabunangs were dispatched for cases where a tabunang was on trial, while, for a commoner's case a commoner officer was sent. In other words, the officer responsible for investigation was selected and appointed based on his social rank. This means that the administrative system of Qaracin Mongols reflected their social structure, which consisted of noble tabunangs and their commoner subjects
著者
堀内 香里
出版者
内陸アジア史学会
雑誌
内陸アジア史研究 (ISSN:09118993)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.28, pp.75-100, 2013-03-31 (Released:2017-10-10)

This article examines the social organization and its functions at the intermediate-level of a banner society of Khalkha Mongols during the Qing times. In the author's terminology, the "intermediate-level" means a level between a banner office and families at which social relations were adjusted. Although in recent years researchers have clarified the social structure of the Mongol banners in the Qing era, they have scarcely demonstrated how their organization worked. This paper aims to elucidate such a problem through examining how people dealt with the cases of "separation" in the Middle Front Banner of Setsen Khan Ayimag during the latter half of the Qing period. "Separation" is equivalent to the Mongolian word "saljiyud", which means the state where nomadic pastoralists dwell apart from groups. The examination showed that the cases of "separation" were handled by the organizations called "sumu" and "otog" at the intermediate-level of the banner society. In other words, the authorities administered its banner through these organizations, and the tayiji managed their own arad through the otog. This proves that management by tayiji and administration under the Qing dynasty were incorporated into a single system and functioned in the banner society of Mongols.
著者
植田 暁
出版者
内陸アジア史学会
雑誌
内陸アジア史研究 (ISSN:09118993)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.28, pp.101-126, 2013-03-31 (Released:2017-10-10)

The purpose of this study is to explain socio-economic changes among Kyrgyz nomads from the 19^<th> to early 20^<th> century. Using geographic information system analysis, settled ethnic groups in Ferghana Province were classified into two groups according to the agricultural management pattern: Uzbeks, Sarts, and Kipchaks, who were engaged in intensive cotton monoculture on irrigated land in the Ferghana valley, and Tajiks and Kyrgyz, who were engaged in grain production and pasturage in the foothills. Under Russian rule cotton production in the Valley made rapid growth for the country's textile industry. Kyrgyz nomads were originally engaged in both agriculture and pasturage in the foothills of the Tian Shan before the Russian conquest of Central Asia. In Ferghana Province, due to the progress of cotton monoculture, the price of grain increased rapidly under Russian rule. This situation forced nomads to increase their grain yields. However, water resources were limited in the foothills. As a result, nomads expanded extensive rain-fed cultivation while maintaining a certain amount of livestock to sell in the market for cash. Sowing in the spring made the coexistence of nomadism and agriculture possible. The unstable rain-fed cultivation was supported by extra income from the economic exchange with settled people, such as selling livestock, seasonal employment in the cotton fields, etc. Nomads' survival strategy of adjusting to the drastic economic changes that occurred in Ferghana Province, was pursued under conditions of adapting to the local natural environment and interacting with other ethnic groups in the region.
著者
青木 雅浩
出版者
内陸アジア史学会
雑誌
内陸アジア史研究 (ISSN:09118993)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.28, pp.127-148, 2013-03-31 (Released:2017-10-10)

The 4th Congress of the Mongolian People's Revolutionary Party was held in September and October 1925 after the end of the conflict between E. Rinchino and T. Ryskulov. The present paper analyzes the activities of M. I. Amagaev - the representative of the Comintern in Mongolia - in the 4th Congress and examines the Mongolian policy of the USSR and the Comintern of that time. The Mongolian policy of the USSR and the Comintern since 1923 was to establish the structures of the Mongolian People's Revolutionary Party, to construct the system in which the Mongolian People's Revolutionary Party would lead the Mongolian state, and to exclude Noyan and Lama from the party and the government. The USSR and the Comintern planned to continue this course after the end of the conflict between Rinchino and Ryskulov. At the 4th Congress, Amagaev attempted to expand the activities of the Mongolian People's Revolutionary Party in the provinces of Outer Mongolia, to promote the construction of the party, and to execute the Mongolian policy of the USSR and the Comintern. At the 4th Congress, the USSR and the Comintern intended to further their Mongolian policy, which was the main cause of the conflict between Rinchino and Ryskulov. However, it led to the subsequent conflict between Amagaev and Dambadorj.