著者
池田 苗夫
出版者
社団法人 日本感染症学会
雑誌
日本傳染病學會雜誌 (ISSN:00214817)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.42, no.5, pp.125-130, 1968-08-20 (Released:2011-11-25)

As mentioned in previous reports, it was clear that the epidemic hemorrhagic fever (EHG) could be induced to quite healthy persons by inoculation of the blood specimens collected from the patients with genuine EHF. Therefore, the agents of EHF were certainly considered to exist in the blood of patients in acute stage of EHF.Dr. Masaji KITANO found a specific species of tick, ‘Togedani’, attaching to rat and playing an important role as a carrier of the disease, and so he insisted that the togedani inhabiting the areas where, EHF was prevelent, might be a natural possessor of the agents. In addition, it was supposed that in such circumstances, other insects such as vermin, fleas, bed-bugs, flies, or mosquitoes might be also reservor of the agents at least transiently. However, because no soarlling blood-sucking insects could remain being active in serious cold of winter in the noreheastern part of China where EHF had been prevalent still in this season, these kinds of insects could be excluded from the object of investigation. The author examined the infectivity of fleas and lice isolated from patients, and acquisition of infectivity on the artificially incubated unstained louse line by stinging the patients with EHF. Thus, it was confirmed that the healthy persons would develop the disease by stinging of poisoning louse.It is not clear whether lice in the epidemic area naturally possess the agents of EHF, but it is doubtless that the poisoning lice which have sucked the blood from a healthy person, may cause him an infection of EHF. Therefore, it is concluded that a louse must be looked upon as a carrier of EHF.On the other hand, as to the flea, the author failed to confirm whether flea had infectivity of EHF to man, in consequence of several biological experiments.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (4 users, 8 posts, 4 favorites)

@cawaiikumasan @CpgUwAUTee4DPoa @mike100mil @ponkohaha000 @nishiokamasanor @kikigaki_owl https://t.co/iAWOwXcZcn
@yamanekofuku @nishiokamasanor @hirohir00010018 @CpgUwAUTee4DPoa @ponkohaha000 @schmalkaizen @KebyJr @Magmag214 @2goRPeSy5hsxd37 @asatian @HmdoxjmZ @Mi5Sas @mgdagmpavmgd @komakimaco @PachelbelCanonD @ogunono @Pooh_advanced @Bo_San_2D @tim123456789021 @kamikaze_49_730 @kentaha9 @newmakkiki @battlepodx @makotodeth @jupiterthunder_ @dennokoziguzagu @Venom76392163 @WAYvAGlSb6RcNym @6E1944 @soft_tractor @go8O7zf4o5jW1ZL @ekesete1 @BjOgu5F4DGuCGwn @glEx6dvjK5CVdav @otsukaikumasan @hossypunch @Number_2019 @onino_huguri @MituzoJ @magoichisaiga @NjalhpGlHN5BOWm @kawacoares3 @MHKRT5TAhWkoQlI @miumiu10021 @qec9AdkQpzgOupq @jjaappaannhhiiy @suki_dango @9joism @Elice_13 @kerry_kinger https://t.co/iAWOwXcZcn
@ymotooka @namiwo_jp @hanihaniwa820 @nishiokamasanor 既に申し上げたのですが、実際の現実として「参考論文を挙げずに感染実験を論じた論文」が実在してしまっている以上、その論法は使用できないのですね。 ただし論文内で問題の論文の共著者「北野政次」の名前を出してはいますが。 流行性出血熱のシラミ, ノミによる感染試験 https://t.co/KLAbENQZ6p
@ymotooka @namiwo_jp @hanihaniwa820 @nishiokamasanor 「誰もが知っている常識であり、そもそも意識にすら上がらない」点は論文にも記載されませんよ。 実例として、以下の論文は間違いなく未知の病原体の人工感染実験を扱ったものですが、そういった歴史的背景をわざわざ説明したりはしていません。 https://t.co/KLAbENQZ6p
@ymotooka @hanihaniwa820 @namiwo_jp @nishiokamasanor これは731部隊に所属した軍医である池田苗雄先生が戦後に発表した下記の2つの論文において、明記されています(論文発表は戦後ですが、実験実施は戦中です)。 流行性出血熱の流行学的調査研究 https://t.co/4G9M4VN2nQ 流行性出血熱のシラミ, ノミによる感染試験 https://t.co/KLAbENQZ6p
@MMBIZ4 @_owl_of_minerva @hyakutanaoki 実験をあまり残虐でない形にアレンジして、あるいは「どの部隊で行われた実験か」「実験の対象者は誰だったのか」は曖昧化したかたちで、医学論文化されていますよ。 https://t.co/5MX0XHVNC4 https://t.co/4G9M4VN2nQ https://t.co/KLAbENQZ6p

収集済み URL リスト