著者
植村 玄輝
出版者
日本哲学会
雑誌
哲学 (ISSN:03873358)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2017, no.68, pp.28-44, 2017-04-01 (Released:2017-06-14)
参考文献数
20

It is commonplace to distinguish two different approaches to the history of philosophy. According to the first approach, the point of studying a text from philosophy’s past is to learn something philosophically important for us today from it. In contrast, the second, more history-oriented approach refuses to read the past philosophical text for the sake of one’s own philosophical interest. For proponents of this approach, the text can be understood only if it is situated in its context in a broad sense. In this discussion, it is sometimes suggested (by Richard Rorty, for instance) that the two approaches do not constitute a dilemma; we can and must do both independently of each other. This suggestion of coexistence, however, would cause a problem for the second approach. Preferring to be exempted from the question of truth in discussing a past philosopher, proponents of this approach would be forced into a distorted understanding of philosophy’s past. In order to avoid this consequence, the present paper proposes a third approach to the history of philosophy, in which we can deal with philosophy’s past historically and philosophically at the same time.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (21 users, 23 posts, 45 favorites)

『哲学史研究は哲学的かつ歴史的でありえるのか』 植村 玄輝 https://t.co/9YQX7yJILy
2017年の日本哲学会大会で、「哲学史研究の哲学的意義とは何か」というシンポジウムが開催されました。私はそのときの登壇者のひとりです。そのときの私の発表は以下の論文を踏まえたものでした。https://t.co/0y5B85DEm2

収集済み URL リスト