著者
町田 昌彦 岩田 亜矢子 山田 進 乙坂 重嘉 小林 卓也 船坂 英之 森田 貴己
出版者
一般社団法人 日本原子力学会
雑誌
日本原子力学会和文論文誌 (ISSN:13472879)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.21, no.1, pp.33-49, 2022 (Released:2022-02-15)
参考文献数
53
被引用文献数
4

We estimate the monthly discharge inventory of tritium from the port of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (1F) from Jun. 2013 to Mar. 2020 using the Voronoi tessellation scheme, following the tritium monitoring inside the port that started in Jun. 2013. As for the missing period from the initial month, Apr. 2011 to May 2013, we calculate the tritium discharge by utilizing the ratio of tritium concentration to 137Cs concentration in stagnant contaminant water during the initial direct run-off period to Jun. 2011 and the discharge inventory correlation between tritium and 137Cs for the next-unknown continuous-discharge period up to May 2013. From all the estimated results over 9 years, we found that the monthly discharge inventory sharply dropped immediately after closing the seaside impermeable wall in Oct. 2015 and subsequently coincided well with the sum of those of drainage and subdrain etc. By comparing the estimated results with those in the normal operation period before the accident, we point out that the discharge inventory from the 1F port after the accident is not very large. Even the estimation for the year 2011 is found to be comparable to the maximum of operating pressurized water reactors releasing relatively large inventories in the number of digits. In the national level, the total domestic release inventory in Japan significantly decreased after the accident owing to the operational shutdown of most plants. Furthermore, 1F and even the total Japanese discharge inventory are found to be minor compared with those of nuclear reprocessing plants and heavy-water reactors on a worldwide level. From the above, we suggest that various scenarios can be openly discussed regarding the management of tritium stored inside 1F with the help of the present estimated data and its comparison with the past discharge inventory.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (6 users, 6 posts, 1 favorites)

@masanoatsuko @ngalyak @tw001101 事故原発から海でどれだけ漏れふ出したのか? 私の概説  福島原発 汚染水流出 https://t.co/JGp1gIGbdH およびCNICの報告 さらに東大のその推移に関する検討をぜひごらんください。 https://t.co/ZmhtIj1yK2
メモ。 CNIC briefの中で触れられている先行文献。 https://t.co/PNKeug1tVw 「1F 港湾の海水交換率(/日)については,0.44‥この値は,事故初期に高濃度汚染水の直接流出が 2 号機取水口付近で起こった際,流出直後の港湾内濃度の減衰過程から算出した値であり,実測データに基づく量」
@ngalyak こっちの論文の推定だと2020年でCs-137月100億ベクレルから以下になっていて微妙。他のトリチウム以外を加えるとどうなるか。 https://t.co/uqu6kE7rnK

収集済み URL リスト